Propagation of Hate Speech on Social Network X
Trends and Approaches
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 13054594 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Eva Matarín (0000-0002-1701-3911, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, autor de correspondencia), Tomás Gómez Franco (0000-0001-6603-7824, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria), Daniel Rodríguez-Peral Bustos (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 13 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-01-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Social Inclusion (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2183-2803 • E-ISSN: 2183-2803 |
| Editorial | Cogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT) |
| DOI | 10.17645/si.9317 |
| OpenAlex | W4406761975 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 37 |
Digital technologies have democratized the transmission of information, enabling individuals to interact and share information instantly through social networks. However, these advancements have also brought about negative aspects such as the propagation of hate speech on social media. This research aims to address the following question: What are the predominant theoretical and methodological approaches in academic research on hate speech on X (formerly known as Twitter)? This study aims to identify and analyze the trends in existing academic research on the proliferation and dissemination of hate speech on the social network X, to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge in this field, and to highlight areas for future research. To conduct this analysis, a mixed‐methods methodology is employed and a systematic literature review is applied as the research technique. Quantitative analysis involves descriptive statistical analysis, while qualitative analysis is conducted using a deductive strategy to study the predetermined categories of research included in this study. Among the main contributions is the integration of findings from multiple studies, facilitating the understanding of this phenomenon, as well as enabling the identification of best practices and existing knowledge gaps in this field
Sociology · Freedom of Expression and Defamation · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Social Media and Politics
The age of Twitter
Prisma2020
Solidarity and strife after the Atlanta spa shootings
Stereotypes and sexism? Effects of gender, topic, and user comments on journalists’ credibility
Mensajes de odio hacia la comunidad LGTBIQ+ en los perfiles de Instagram de la prensa española
Can We Counteract Hate? Effects of Online Hate Speech and Counter Speech on the Perception of Social Groups
Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity
Platformed racism
After the ‘APIcalypse’
Conflictos armados y su tratamiento en educación. Análisis de la producción científica de los últimos 25 años en la Web of Science
Discourse Structures, Weaponization of Language and Ethiopia’s Civil War
Revisión Sistemática sobre Educación para una Ciudadanía Global Transformadora
Hate Speech and Polarization Around the “Trans Law” in Spain
Dilemmas Between Freedom of Speech and Hate Speech
Accountability Issues, Online Covert Hate Speech, and the Efficacy of Counter‐Speech
Feminism as a polarizing axis of the political conversation on Twitter
Disinformation and hate speech toward female sports journalists
Eso no me lo dices en la calle. Análisis del discurso del odio contra las mujeres en Twitter
Inflaming public debate
Political hate speech of the far right on Twitter in Latin America
Ghosts of white methods? The challenges of Big Data research in exploring racism in digital context
Online Football-Related Antisemitism in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic
Argumentation profiles and the manipulation of common ground. The arguments of populist leaders on Twitter
It's Not How You Say It, It's What You Say
From Polarization to Hate
Antisemitism on Twitter
Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research
Politicization of Hate and Weaponization of Twitter/X in a Polarized Digital Space in Nigeria
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |