Emerging in the East
The Shanghai Biennale’s pathways to legitimation, 1996 to 2018
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 13059495 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Chenchen Zhu (0000-0002-1351-3986, Erasmus University Rotterdam, autor de correspondencia), Laura Braden (0000-0001-9469-790X, Erasmus University Rotterdam) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 9 |
| Número | 1 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-06-24 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Journal of Chinese Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2198-2635 • E-ISSN: 2198-2635 |
| Editorial | Springer Nature (PUBLISHER • SG) |
| DOI | 10.1186/s40711-022-00167-0 |
| OpenAlex | W4283366466 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 36 |
This study examines the 22-year development of the Shanghai Biennale from a localized contemporary art exhibition to an internationally renowned art biennale. Through the lens of organizational legitimacy, this research examines how the Shanghai Biennale negotiated changing external pressures to establish within China and grow into the international art world. Using a mix-methods approach, we first create a unique database of participant nationality and then examine artist and curatorial statements, media reports, and interviews with organizers and curators of the Shanghai Biennale from 1996 to 2018. Our study delineates three periods of the Shanghai Biennale’s development: incipient (1996–1998), internationalization (2000–2010), and expanding period (2012–2018). Through these periods we examine the different pathways by which the Shanghai Biennale attained legitimacy first within the local and national Chinese context and then within the Biennale’s expansion into the international art scene. We find at the beginning stage of the Shanghai Biennale, establishing local legitimacy was the foremost concern. When the Shanghai Biennale started to diffuse into the global art world in 2000, focus shifted towards remaking the Shanghai Biennale to comply with international perceptions. That said, our research finds both local and international legitimacy requirements remained salient simultaneously, with the importance of maintaining a good relationship with the Chinese State as a critical basis for internationalization and development. In the most recent editions, more local and non-Western features are included in the Shanghai Biennale, signaling the Biennale’s efforts of distinguishing itself in the global biennale scene. This research contributes to organizational study by closely examining a cultural organization’s ability to negotiate legitimacy requirements in different contexts, but also empirically responds to recent calls for studies on the global development of non-Western biennales
Art · China · Context (archaeology · Exhibition · Internationalization · Legitimacy · Legitimation · Media studies · Political science · Sociology · State (computer science · Visual arts · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · History · Law · Management and Organizational Studies · Social and Cultural Dynamics
The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis
Beyond Survival
Managing Legitimacy
The field of cultural production
Cultural strategies in Shanghai
An unfinished task
Collectors and Collections
The globalization of art and the ‘Biennials of Resistance’
The Other Network
Playing the Chinese card’
Considering Huanjing
From National Art to Critical Globalism
Gatekeepers, Poachers and Pests in the Globalized Contemporary Art World System
Global Dawning
The Indian Biennale Effect
The Iron Cage Revisited
From the Armory to academia
Intellectualization and Art World Development
Rethinking the center-periphery model
Introduction to special issue on Global art markets
Networks Created Within Exhibition
Symbolic Production in the Art Biennial
Legitimacy as a Social Process
What Marco Polo Forgot
The Categorical Imperative
Approaching adulthood
| Citas por año | 1 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Altamente citado | No |