Gender, Power, and Nonpreferred Contraceptive Use in the United States
Results from a National Survey
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 13103544 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Kristen Lagasse Burke (0000-0002-1833-3722, The University of Texas at Austin), Leon Lindberg (0000-0003-2660-9407, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 10 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2378-0231 • E-ISSN: 2378-0231 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/23780231241282641 |
| OpenAlex | W4403938725 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 6 |
| Referencias citadas | 68 |
Power dynamics in social interactions likely affect individuals’ ability to use their preferred contraception, yet research has primarily emphasized financial barriers. Using data from a national survey of people assigned female at birth, we apply a social-ecological framework to assess a broader range of factors shaping nonpreferred use. Over one-quarter of respondents were not using their preferred method; among them, nearly half preferred vasectomy, condoms, or withdrawal. Partner disagreement was the most common reason for nonpreferred use and was associated with experiencing partner contraceptive coercion. Black women, who face structural racism in the health care system, were more likely to attribute their nonpreferred use to a provider’s recommendation. These findings demonstrate how gender and power shape contraceptive use despite the preferences of those at risk of pregnancy, highlighting the need for cultural, policy, and health care shifts to resolve contraceptive preference-use discordance and increase gender equity in the responsibility of pregnancy prevention
Current Population Survey · Demographic economics · Economics · Environmental health · Family planning · National Survey of Family Growth · Physics · Population · Power (physics · Research methodology · Survey research · Applied Psychology · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Medicine · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Reproductive Health and Technologies
Contraceptive autonomy of adolescents and young adults in the U.S. South
The violence of reproductive injustice
Differences in Contraceptive Method Discontinuation and Contraceptive Method Preferences by Disability Status
Perception of Having Enough Information to Make Contraceptive Decisions
How Do We Measure Contraceptive Method Preferences? Evidence From a Scoping Review
Meeting Contraceptive Preferences Among Low‐Income Postpartum Texans
Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018
Challenging unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy
Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making
Under (implicit) pressure
Translating Social Ecological Theory into Guidelines for Community Health Promotion
Vasectomy Knowledge and Interest Among U.S. Men Who Do Not Intend to Have More Children
Satisfaction, Resignation, and Dissatisfaction with Long-Acting Reversible Contraception among Low-Income Postpartum Texans
Young Women's Experiences with Coercive and Noncoercive Condom Use Resistance
Young Women's Contraceptive Decision Making
Barriers to Contraception and Interest In Over‐the‐Counter Access Among Low‐Income Women
Rights to Sexual and Reproductive Health
National Needs of Family Planning Among US Men Aged 15 to 44 Years
Pleasure, Power, and Inequality
Sexual Minority Women and Contraceptive Use
Telehealth for Contraceptive Care During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Provider Bias in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (Larc) Promotion and Removal
Contraceptive Autonomy
Does Choice Make a Difference to Contraceptive Use? Evidence from East Java
Meeting Preferences for Specific Contraceptive Methods
Fundamental Elements of the Quality of Care
Reasons for Contraceptive Nonuse among Women Having Unmet Need for Contraception in Developing Countries
Development and Validation of a Reproductive Autonomy Scale
The Sexual Acceptability of Contraception
More Than a Physical Burden
A Qualitative Examination of Men’s Condom Use Attitudes and Resistance
Accounting for Women's Orgasm and Sexual Enjoyment in College Hookups and Relationships
Talking about male body-based contraceptives
The limitations of patient-centered care
I was obligated to accept
Supply-Side Versus Demand-Side Unmet Need
Men and masculinities in qualitative research on vasectomy
Reproductive Oppression Enters the Twenty-First Century
Astronauts in the Sperm World
Strategic Silence
It's those Pills that are Ruining Me
Men Bring Condoms, Women Take Pills
Hegemonic Masculinity
Gendered Divisions of Fertility Work
Gender and risk assessment in contraceptive technologies
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 6 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 6 |