The Doomsday Argument Reconsidered
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 13123778 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jon Mills (0000-0003-3673-0884, Adelphi University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 4 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 113-127 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-05-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Eidos A Journal for Philosophy of Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2544-302X • E-ISSN: 2544-302X |
| Editorial | University of Warsaw (PUBLISHER • PL) |
| DOI | 10.14394/eidos.jpc.2020.0035 |
| OpenAlex | W3117961974 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 1 |
In our current unstable world, nuclear warfare, climate crises, and techno nihilism are three perilous clouds hovering over an anxious humanity. In this article I examine our current state of affairs with regard to the imminent risk of nuclear holocaust, rapid climate emergencies destroying the planet, and the cultural and political consequences of emerging technologies on the fate of civilization. In the wake of innumerable existential threats to the future of our world, I revisit the plausibility of the Doomsday Argument, which predicts the end of human existence
Argument (complex analysis · Civilization · Environmental ethics · Existentialism · Humanity · Nihilism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · History · Law · Philosophy · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |