Higher Education Compensation Policies and Their Impact on Academic Staff Performance
A Rasch Model Approach to Policy Implications in Indonesian Universities
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 13128564 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Herpratiwi (Lampung University, autor de correspondencia), Heru Wahyudi (0000-0002-4584-8078, Lampung University), Fatkhur Rohman (0000-0001-5176-4893, Lampung University), Aryan Danil Mirza BR (Lampung University), Rudi Hartono (0000-0003-4540-3850, Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Páginas | 421-438 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-11-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2589-1316 • E-ISSN: 2589-1316 |
| Editorial | Lectito Journals (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.64753/jcasc.v10i2.1615 |
| OpenAlex | W7106611165 |
| Idioma | EN |
Compensation policies in higher education are pivotal in shaping faculty motivation, institutional commitment, and overall academic productivity. However, disparities in compensation structures across public and private universities, employment categories, and regional contexts pose significant challenges to equity and performance in the academic sector. This study employs the Rasch Model, a robust psychometric approach, to examine how compensation policies influence academic staff performance in Indonesian universities. Utilizing a large-scale survey of 1,416 faculty members and academic support staff, the findings reveal that perceived compensation fairness is a key determinant of job satisfaction, research engagement, and institutional loyalty. Results indicate that structured, performance-based compensation models enhance faculty retention and productivity, while disparities in salary schemes contribute to dissatisfaction and increased turnover intentions. The study underscores the urgent need for policy reforms that integrate transparent salary frameworks, competitive financial incentives, and alignment with international benchmarks to ensure sustainable faculty engagement and institutional excellence. These insights provide critical implications for policymakers, university leaders, and higher education governance bodies in designing more equitable and performance-driven compensation systems
Benchmarking · Compensation (psychology · Corporate governance · Equity (law · Higher education · Rasch model · Remuneration · Salary · Educational Practices and Challenges · Higher Education and Employability · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |