Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Development, Reliability, and Validity of the Children's Questions about Death Scale

Datos Bibliográficos

ID13628306
AutoresFrank J Richardson (Johns Hopkins University Hospital School of Medicine, Kennedy Krieger Institute, autor de correspondencia), Richard C Baker (California School of Professional Psychology-San Diego), Robert Kastenbaum (Arizona State University)
Año1998
Volumen36
Número4
Páginas343-357
Fecha de publicación1998-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaOMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0030-2228 • E-ISSN: 1541-3764
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2190/3ux3-591n-wybc-w6g8
OpenAlexW2103833189
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas13

Most measures of parent-child communication about death are specific only to families of chronically ill children. In contrast, The Children's Questions About Death Scale (CQADS) was constructed to assess how effectively mothers respond to questions about death that their healthy children are likely to ask them. The CQADS originated from a pool of 237 questions that mothers ( N = 116) reported they had been asked by their children regarding death. Final item selection was determined by categorizing the questions using four categories (essence, intentionality, loss of relationship, and self-oriented) and selecting a representative set of four items in each category that demonstrated adequate response variability and inter-rater agreement. The scoring criteria for the CQADS were established on the basis of expert opinion in the literature. Operationally defined scoring criteria were developed so that mothers' written responses to each of the questions on the CQADS could be rated for effectiveness on a scale from 1 ( not at all effective) to 5 ( very effective). Total scores could range from 16 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater effectiveness in responding to children's questions about death. The CQADS has excellent test-retest reliability ( r = .95, p < .05), and inter-rater reliability greater than .80

Developmental psychology · Reliability (semiconductor · Scale (ratio · Set (abstract data type · Test (biology · Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Optimism, Hope, and Well-being · Psychology

  • Predictors of Children's Understandings of Death

    Open Access•Sally B Hunter, Dorothy E Smith et al.•OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying•2008

  • Death Education

    Open Access•Frank J Richardson, Kevin P Weinfurt•OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying•1997

  • Childhood, death, and cognitive development

    Gerald P Koocher•Developmental Psychology•1973

  • The Child’s Concept of Death

    Hermine von Hug-Hellmuth•The Psychoanalytic Quarterly•1965

  • Talking about Death

    J Howard Hovde, Earl A Grollman et al.•The Family Coordinator•1971

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,06
Intervalo de citas2008 - 2008 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae