Comparison of Conservation Training Procedures
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 13657136 |
|---|---|
| Autores | David R Anderson (0000-0002-1128-6206, Duke Medical Center, autor de correspondencia), Alice T Clark (University of North Dakota) |
| Año | 1978 |
| Volumen | 43 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 495-499 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1978-10-01 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.1978.43.2.495 |
| OpenAlex | W2023735347 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 7 |
Direct comparisons were made among four different conservation training procedures, reversibility training, compensation training, addidition/subtraction training and a verbal reinforcement method in order to determine which might best facilitate conservation acquisition in previously nonconserving first grade students. The data indicated that verbal methods stressing principles of reversibility and addition/subtraction resulted in the acquisition of concepts of conservation statistically comparable to that of a group of natural conservers
Arithmetic · Compensation (psychology · Geography · Reinforcement · Subtraction · Training (meteorology · Animal and Plant Science Education · Art Education and Development · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citas por año | 0,04 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 1979 - 2005 (27) |
| Altamente citado | No |