Psychometric Properties of a Four-Component Norwegian Organizational Justice Scale
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 13664407 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Olav Kjellevold Olsen (0000-0002-7674-7229, Department of Leadership Development, The Royal Norwegian Naval Academy, autor de correspondencia), Are Eidhamar (The Norwegian Military Academy), Helga Myrseth (0000-0003-3321-8244, University of Bergen), Sigurd W Hystad (0000-0002-7245-9828, University of Bergen) |
| Año | 2012 |
| Volumen | 110 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 571-588 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2012-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/01.08.14.pr0.110.2.571-588 |
| PMID | 22662411 |
| OpenAlex | W1984865297 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 47 |
Organizational justice has attracted attention as a predictor of employees' mental and physical health as well as commitment and work outcomes. The lack of a Norwegian translation of an organizational justice scale has precluded its use in Norway. Four dimensions of the organizational justice construct were examined in a Norwegian military context, including facet measures of distributional, interpersonal, and informational justice developed by Colquitt in 2001, in addition to procedural justice developed by Moorman in 1991. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a four-dimensional structure with good internal consistency. Follow-up analyses have suggested that the four dimensions were nested beneath a general, latent organizational justice factor. A positive relationship between organizational justice and self-sacrificial behavior was found, indicating satisfactory construct validity. The results demonstrate that the Norwegian Organizational Justice Scale is a reliable and construct-valid measure of organizational justice in a Norwegian setting
Confirmatory factor analysis · Construct (python library · Context (archaeology · Economic Justice · Interpersonal communication · Norwegian · Organizational commitment · Organizational justice · Political science · Procedural justice · Scale (ratio · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Psychology · Social Psychology · Workplace Health and Well-being · Workplace Violence and Bullying
Latent Variable Models
The Development of Hierarchical Factor Solutions
Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with nonlinear constraints
Using a single‐item approach to measure facet job satisfaction
Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors
Cronbach’s α , Revelle’s β , and Mcdonald’s ω H
Being Good or Being Known
Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice
Estimating Generalizability to a Latent Variable Common to All of a Scale's Indicators
Organizational Justice
Justice at the millennium
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Overall job satisfaction
Fit indices in covariance structure modeling
On the dimensionality of organizational justice
Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.
A Scaled Difference Chi-Square Test Statistic for Moment Structure Analysis
A Theory of Justice
Handbook of Organizational Justice
Congeneric and (Essentially) Tau-Equivalent Estimates of Score Reliability
Single-Item Versus Multiple-Item Measurement Scales
Psychometrics is Datametrics
Inequity In Social Exchange
Scale Reliability, Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha, and Violations of Essential Tau-Equivalence with Fixed Congeneric Components
A Step toward a Common Measure of Organizational Justice
Estimating the Reliability of a Single-Item Measure
Measuring Adolescent Depression
Organizational Justice
Procedural Justice
Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests
Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores
Achilles in Vietnam
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,27 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |