Performance Evaluation
A Case for the Use of Consensus Ratings
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 13675591 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lawrence S Kleiman (University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, autor de correspondencia), John W Lounsbury (University of Tennessee at Knoxville), Robert H Faley (Kent State University) |
| Año | 1987 |
| Volumen | 60 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 407-413 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1987-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.1987.60.2.407 |
| OpenAlex | W2121031588 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 6 |
Data from a sample of government research scientists were used to compare the psychometric properties of pooled and consensus ratings of job performance. It was hypothesized that consensus ratings would possess less halo and leniency error and greater validity than would pooled ratings. The findings supported the halo hypothesis and partially supported the validity hypothesis. Given the severity of the “criterion problem” in validation research, further research was recommended to extend the generalizability of these findings to other performance appraisal settings
Construct validity · Criterion validity · Developmental psychology · External validity · Generalizability theory · Psychometrics · Sample (material · Accounting and Organizational Management · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Psychology · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Psychology
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,09 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2004 - 2007 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |