It Ain't Necessarily So
An Essay Review of Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 14432118 |
|---|---|
| Autores | George Nakhnikian (Indiana University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2004 |
| Volumen | 71 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 593-604 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2004-10-01 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0031-8248 • E-ISSN: 1539-767X |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1086/423628 |
| OpenAlex | W1996232524 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 4 |
Nature exhibits a rich variety of adaptations. Cells contain complex biomolecular structures, such as proteins, that are exquisitely adapted to perform specific biological functions. Evolutionary biology explains how biomolecular structures evolve. Intelligent design creationists reject evolutionary explanations. They want to believe that all adaptations in nature are the handiwork of God. Their critics aver that “it ain't necessarily so.” The anthology under review is an excellent display of the issues between intelligent design creationists and their critics. I agree with the critics
Creationism · Epistemology · Intelligent design · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Evolution and Science Education · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
| Altamente citado | No |
|---|