Democratic Virtue, Comparative Ethics, and Contemporary Islam

Datos Bibliográficos

ID14760596
AutoresJohn Kelsay (autor de correspondencia)
Año2005
Volumen33
Número4
Páginas697-707
Fecha de publicación2005-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Religious Ethics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0384-9694 • E-ISSN: 1467-9795
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9795.2005.00245.x
OpenAlexW1997526399
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas2

This essay illustrates the kind of moral analysis Jeffrey Stout advocates in Democracy and Tradition by way of examining a conversation among Muslims that took place between June and December 2002. Their debate centers on al‐Qaída's legitimacy as God's chosen defender of Islam, which is called into question due to the tension between al‐Qaída's military tactics and the concepts of honorable combat held within the Islamic tradition. This giving and taking of reasons in both defense and detraction of al‐Qaída's tactics demonstrates the living reality of Islamic tradition—the ongoing process of striving to discern God's will in light of communal agreements about the authority of certain texts and the validity of established rules for interpreting them

Conversation · Democracy · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Islam · Legitimacy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Theology · Virtue · Virtue ethics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Philosophy · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence