The lack of refugee burden-sharing in Tanzania

Tragic effects

Datos Bibliográficos

ID14816109
AutoresMichèle Morel (autor de correspondencia)
Año2009
Volumen22
Número1
Fecha de publicación2009-02-08
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAVRUG-bulletin/Afrika Focus (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0772-0793 • E-ISSN: 0772-084X
EditorialWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.21825/af.v22i1.5063
OpenAlexW2397806353
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas11

The United Republic of Tanzania has been and currently still is one of the most important host countries in the world for refugees. The majority of those refugees have been living in camps for many years and have no prospect of a durable solution of their situation via repatriation, integration or resettlement. As a result, Tanzania is confronted with protracted refugee situations. The purpose of this article is to answer the question who is responsible for the plight of these refugees. Tanzania’s national refugee policy since the 1960s is analysed, whereby a clear evolution can be observed from an ‘Open Door’ policy to a policy with heavy restrictions and the absence of local integration as a durable solution. However, it will be concluded that it is not Tanzania but the international community that is to be held responsible. There is a lack of international refugee burden-sharing, as evidenced by the lack of an international legal framework for durable solutions for refugees. A ‘common but differentiated responsibility’ should be the basis of international cooperation to solve protracted refugee situations such as those occurring in Tanzania. Key words: African Great Lakes region, protracted refugee situations, national policy

Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Political science · Refugee · Repatriation · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Tanzania · Diaspora, migration, transnational identity · Law · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Migration, Refugees, and Integration