Por qué las ciencias sociales son naturales, y por qué no pueden
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15039730 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jesús Zamora-Bonilla (0000-0003-0185-9768, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2012 |
| Volumen | 0 |
| Número | 23 |
| Páginas | 101 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2012-09-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Empiria Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1139-5737 • E-ISSN: 2174-0682 |
| Editorial | UNED - Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5944/empiria.23.2012.831 |
| OpenAlex | W2136427993 |
| Idioma | ES |
| Referencias citadas | 5 |
It is argued that there are no fundamental ontological nor epistemological differences between the natural and the social sciences, though the social realm is so complex and unstable that it makes it difficult the emergence (and, hence, the discovery) of significant robust regularities. As a suggestion of how social sciences might be ‘naturalised’, an abstract model of normative based behaviour is also presented, such that it is coherent with empirical discoveries in cognitive sciences and capable of being implemented in computer simulations
Epistemology · Geography · Humanities · Natural (archaeology · Normative · Realm · Sociology · Educational theories and practices · Literary and Cultural Studies · Philosophy · Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |