The initial development and validation of a child-oriented food literacy questionnaire
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15091078 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ilse M J van Lier (0000-0001-8381-1252, Maastricht University Campus Venlo, autor de correspondencia), Britt van Belkom (0000-0001-9410-2742, Maastricht University Campus Venlo), Edgar van Mil (0000-0002-0888-0730, Maastricht University Campus Venlo), Remco C Havermans (0000-0001-5832-8357, Maastricht University Campus Venlo) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Volumen | 29 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | e26-e26 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Public Health Nutrition (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1368980025101651 |
| PMID | 41460020 |
| OpenAlex | W7117455072 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 43 |
Objective: The Dutch Children’s Food Literacy Questionnaire (DCFLQ) was developed and validated to assess food literacy among children aged 8–12 years. The DCFLQ is structured around farm-to-fork principles, including questions on food production, distribution, consumption, waste, and sustainability. Design: After initial item pool creation, the DCFLQ was developed in collaboration with experts and children. The validation process included assessments of reliability and construct validity, as well as a test–retest evaluation in a subgroup of children. Setting: The expert panel consisted of domain-related researchers, a pedagogue, a paediatrician, dietitians and a primary school teacher. Children were recruited via primary schools and a sports club. Participants: A total of eleven experts and twenty-seven children participated in the development process; 608 children participated in the validation process. Results: The final questionnaire comprised twenty-nine questions and demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0·80) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0·81). DCFLQ scores positively correlated with age, indicating that food literacy is higher in older children. Conclusions: The DCFLQ is a valuable tool for assessing the effectiveness of nutrition intervention programmes and monitoring Dutch children’s food literacy over time. International expert consensus on developing food literacy instruments is needed, as diversity in assessment tools impedes cross-cultural comparisons
Diversity (politics · Health literacy · Intervention (counseling · Literacy · MEDLINE · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Diverse Educational Innovations Studies · Environmental Education and Sustainability
The Nuances of Health Literacy, Nutrition Literacy, and Food Literacy
The Consequences of Childhood Overweight and Obesity
Bring Back Home Economics Education
The epidemiological burden of obesity in childhood
Predicting adult obesity from childhood obesity
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research
Food and nutrition literacy (FNLIT) and its predictors in primary schoolchildren in Iran
Measuring and Exploring Children’s Health Literacy in The Netherlands
Factors associated with ultra-processed foods consumption
The relationship between food literacy and dietary intake in adolescents
Development and test–retest reliability of a nutrition knowledge questionnaire for primary-school children
Identifying attributes of food literacy
Assessing food and nutrition literacy in children and adolescents
Involvement in home meal preparation is associated with food preference and self-efficacy among Canadian children
Defining food literacy
Defining food literacy and its components
Development and evaluation of a food literacy questionnaire for schoolchildren in France
Development and validation of a food literacy instrument for school children in a Danish context
Peer influence on snacking behavior in adolescence
Nutrition knowledge and food intake
Involving children in meal preparation. Effects on food intake
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |