Task Requirements and Media Choice in Collaborative Writing
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15215752 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Robert Kraut, Robert E Kraut (0000-0002-8554-2137, autor de correspondencia), Jolene Galegher (Carnegie Mellon University), R Fish (0000-0001-7198-0403), Barbara L Chalfonte (Princeton University), Barbara Chalfonte |
| Año | 1992 |
| Volumen | 7 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 375-407 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1992-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Human-Computer Interaction (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0737-0024 • E-ISSN: 1532-7051 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1207/s15327051hci0704_2 |
| OpenAlex | W2109409667 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 15 |
| Referencias citadas | 26 |
Modalities such as face-to-face meetings permit rich communication, which involves both expressiveness and interactivity. Modalities such as text annotation or electronic mail, however, limit both. Contingency theory, as applied to collaborative writing, says that as the equivocality of the writing task increases, communication modalities that support rich communication are more likely to be used. In addition, it says that if these modalities are used, equivocal tasks can be carried out with greater ease and better results. This article explores these hypotheses using multiple data sources: an interview study tracing the history of 55 published collaborative articles, two field experiments comparing the use of face-to-face communication and electronic mail as media for collaborative writing, and a laboratory experiment comparing voice and text as media for annotating documents. Taken together, the findings of these investigations are loosely consistent with a contingency theory of media use, but they suggest that careful measures of task characteristics are needed to obtain a detailed understanding of the effects of particular task/technology combinations. Further, they indicate that it may be important to consider the distinction between the interactivity and expressiveness components of media richness in making decisions about what technologies to buy or build
Contingency · Face (sociological concept · Field (mathematics · Human–computer interaction · Interactivity · Linguistics · Modalities · Modality (human–computer interaction · Multimedia · Sociology · Task (project management · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Knowledge Management and Sharing · Team Dynamics and Performance
Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions.
Out of Sight, Out of Sync
Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media
Cooperation and Coordination in an International Intervention
Cooperation and Coordination in an International Intervention
Communicating in a proper way
Modelling Situated Actions in Collaborative Hypertext Databases
Design of an Internet‐based system for remote Dutch auctions
Rising Up from the MUD
Psychology
Technology, Group Process, and Group Outcomes
Things to Talk About When Talking About Things
Collaborative Writing Is Hard to Support
Accommodating mixed sensory/modal preferences in collaborative writing systems
Partage de l'information en situation de coopération à distance et nouvelles technologies de la communication
Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Handbook of Social Cognition
Who can catch a liar
Relationships and Tasks in Scientific Research Collaboration
Cognitive Egocentrism and the Problem of Audience Awareness in Written Discourse
Revising Strategies in Twelfth Grade Students’ Transactional Writing
The role of audible and visible back-channel responses in interpersonal communication
Listener responsiveness and the coordination of conversation
Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations
| Obras citantes distintas | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,48 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1995 - 2020 (26) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 15 |