Evaluability Assessment of a National Driver Retraining Program
Are We Evaluating in the Right Lane
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15247136 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mélanie Joanisse (University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ontario, autor de correspondencia), Arne Stinchcombe (0000-0002-2101-3535, University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ontario), Stephanie Yamin (0000-0002-9702-314X, University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ontario) |
| Año | 2010 |
| Volumen | 25 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 27-50 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2010-03-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0834-1516 • E-ISSN: 1496-7308 |
| Editorial | University of Toronto Press (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.3138/cjpe.025.002 |
| OpenAlex | W2135942607 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 5 |
An evaluability assessment (EA) of the 55 Alive program, a national older driver refresher course aimed at improving driving skills, was conducted. This EA adds to the evaluation literature as previous outcome evaluations neglected to explore whether this program was prepared for such assessments. A mixed-method protocol was executed across three community sites. Based on the results of this EA, several suggestions for future evaluations are discussed: (a) sampling all stakeholder levels for a more holistic snapshot of the program, (b) using EA to facilitate stakeholders’ engagement in the evaluation, and (c) incorporating scientists specializing in the area within the evaluation
Evaluation methods · Medical education · Political science · Program evaluation · Protocol (science · Public relations · Retraining · Snapshot (computer storage · Stakeholder · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Engineering · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Medicine · Older Adults Driving Studies · Psychology · Public Administration · Urban Transport and Accessibility
| Citas por año | 0,2 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Altamente citado | No |