Dilemmas in Supervising and Mentoring Criminology Graduate Students
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15316951 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Charles Crawford (0000-0002-9009-5271, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2010 |
| Volumen | 22 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 226-246 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2010-11-06 |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Criminal Justice Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1051-1253 • E-ISSN: 1745-9117 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10511253.2010.517770 |
| OpenAlex | W2094296559 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 17 |
The mentoring process is essential for graduate education and the preparation of the next generation of scholars in criminology and criminal justice. However, it is a process that can be filled with challenges and dilemmas. This study seeks to gather information on how faculty members in 31 doctoral programs in criminology and criminal justice in the USA select graduate students to mentor and supervise their experiences during the process, as well as basic demographic and departmental information. In addition, participants were asked to review scenarios that involved professional dilemmas in working with graduate students and report how they would handle the situation. One‐way ANOVA results revealed statistically significant differences in how faculty members responded to various problems in the mentoring process
Criminal justice · Criminology · Graduate students · Pedagogy · Sociology · Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions · Higher Education Research Studies · Mentoring and Academic Development · Psychology
Myths, metaphors, and mentors
Conducting Online Surveys
Mentoring in academe
Building scholars
Standing in the shadows
Mentoring for Success in Criminal Justice and Criminology
E-mail Survey Response Rates
Graduate education in psychology
Mentoring Graduate Students of Color
Professors as Models and Mentors for College Students
Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys
| Citas por año | 0,36 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Altamente citado | No |