Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Intrapartum Electronic Cigarette Use and Birth Outcomes

Evidence from a Population-Based Study

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15499504
AutoresMichelle Azar (0000-0003-4408-021X, Central Michigan University), M Elena Oatey (Trinity Health Grand Rapids), Michelle H Moniz (0000-0002-8414-4268, University of Michigan), Beth A Bailey (0000-0002-5637-9983, Central Michigan University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2024
Volumen21
Número11
Páginas1449-1449
Fecha de publicación2024-10-31
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
EditorialMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph21111449
PMID39595716
OpenAlexW4403948539
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas34

The harms of combustible cigarette (CC) use in pregnancy for fetal development are well studied. Less understood are the potential impacts of newer non-combustible cigarette alternatives, including electronic cigarettes (ECs). Our goal was to examine whether EC use during pregnancy predicts increased risk of adverse birth outcomes. This retrospective cohort study used data from the Obstetrics Initiative (OBI), a statewide collaborative of 70 maternity hospitals. OBI's clinical registry of data on nulliparous, term, singleton, and vertex fetal presentation pregnancies were from medical records. Three groups of pregnancy cigarette users (Controls (n = 26,394), CC (n = 2216), and EC (n = 493)) were compared on birth outcomes, controlling for background differences. Controls were defined as nonsmokers of ECs or CCs. Compared to the controls, the EC group had significantly lower birth weight, while the CC group had reduced birthweight and greater rates of arterial cord pH < 7.1. Compared to EC users, CC users had higher rates of neonates requiring antibiotics and NICU admission. Growing evidence suggests ECs are not safer alternatives to CCs and use during pregnancy should be discouraged. Additional research is needed, as non-significant trends for increased risk of several adverse neonatal outcomes following EC use were found, potentially significant in larger studies with average risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes and when frequency and timing of EC exposure are considered

Electronic cigarette · Environmental health · Population · Demography · Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging · Medicine · Smoking Behavior and Cessation

  • Comparative effects of electronic cigarettes and dual use of electronic and conventional cigarettes on adverse pregnancy outcomes

    Open Access•Kanokporn Sukhato, Thunyarat Anothaisintawee et al.•BMC Public Health•2025

  • Cigarette smoking during pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes

    Open Access•Baptiste Tarasi, Jacques Cornuz et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  • Gestational Women’s Perceptions About the Harms of Cigarette and E-Cigarette Use During Pregnancy

    Open Access•Page D Dobbs, Yu Lu et al.•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2020

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2025 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae