Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Urgent Admission and Inequities in Acute Hospital Stay in Canada

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15501547
AutoresKisalaya Basu (0009-0005-1275-5341, Health Canada, autor de correspondencia)
Año2026
Volumen23
Número4
Páginas432-432
Fecha de publicación2026-03-30
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
EditorialMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph23040432
OpenAlexW7143440358
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas2

Background: The Canada Health Act (CHA), enacted in 1984, guarantees universal access to medically necessary care, yet inequities in hospital use persist. Acute length of stay (ALOS) is a key indicator of hospital efficiency, patient recovery, and healthcare system performance, with prolonged stays linked to higher costs, avoidable infections, and strain on acute care capacity. Understanding patterns in ALOS is critical not only for hospital management but also for public health, as extended stays can limit timely access to care and exacerbate population-level health inequities. Objective: This study examines social, geographic, and clinical gradients in ALOS and investigates whether the effects of admission urgency vary by sex, neighbourhood income, and rural–urban residence within a universal healthcare system. Methods: Using 2024–2025 hospital discharge data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, this study examined ALOS as a function of comorbidity, sex, socioeconomic status, rural–urban residence (geography), and admission type (urgent versus elective). Interaction effects between admission urgency and key social and geographic variables were evaluated to assess subgroup differences in ALOS. Results: Disparities in ALOS were evident. Older age, male sex, urgent admission, and greater comorbidity were associated with longer stays, whereas higher neighbourhood income and urban residence were linked to shorter stays. Interaction analyses revealed substantial heterogeneity: compared with elective rural admissions, urgent urban admissions had 30.4% longer ALOS. Urgent admissions also amplified socioeconomic and sex-based differences, with male patients experiencing 27.9% longer stays than females. Conclusions: From a public health perspective, these findings highlight how system capacity constraints and social inequities jointly shape hospital use. Reducing avoidable variation in ALOS will require policies that strengthen acute care surge capacity, improve coordination for urgent admissions, and address upstream socioeconomic and geographic barriers to care, thereby promoting more equitable and efficient hospital services

Acute care · Comorbidity · Health care · Neighbourhood (mathematics · Public health · Public hospital · Residence · Socioeconomic status · Emergency and Acute Care Studies · Frailty in Older Adults · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

  • Investigation of rural–urban differences in hospitalization for ambulatory care‐sensitive conditions

    Open Access•Yihong Bai, Saverio Stranges et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2025

  • High Health Care Utilization and Costs Associated with Lower Socio-economic Status

    Open Access•Mark Lemstra, J P Mackenbach et al.•Canadian Journal of Public Health•2009

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae