Predictions of tDCS treatment response in PTSD patients using EEG based classification
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15519562 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sang‐Ha Kim (0000-0002-1763-5366, Sookmyung Women's University), Sangha Kim, Chaeyeon Yang (0000-0002-8355-0571, Inje University), Suh-Yeon Dong (Sookmyung Women's University, autor de correspondencia), Seung-hwan Lee (0000-0003-0305-3709, Inje University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 13 |
| Páginas | 876036-876036 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-06-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Frontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640 |
| Editorial | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.876036 |
| PMID | 35845448 |
| OpenAlex | W4285819519 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 41 |
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging therapeutic tool for treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Prior studies have shown that tDCS responses are highly individualized, thus necessitating the individualized optimization of treatment configurations. To date, an effective tool for predicting tDCS treatment outcomes in patients with PTSD has not yet been proposed. Therefore, we aimed to build and validate a tool for predicting tDCS treatment outcomes in patients with PTSD. Forty-eight patients with PTSD received 20 min of 2 mA tDCS stimulation in position of the anode over the F3 and cathode over the F4 region. Non-responders were defined as those with less than 50% improvement after reviewing clinical symptoms based on the Clinician-Administered DSM-5 PTSD Scale (before and after stimulation). Resting-state electroencephalograms were recorded for 3 min before and after stimulation. We extracted power spectral densities (PSDs) for five frequency bands. A support vector machine (SVM) model was used to predict responders and non-responders using PSDs obtained before stimulation. We investigated statistical differences in PSDs before and after stimulation and found statistically significant differences in the F8 channel in the theta band ( p = 0.01). The SVM model had an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.93 for predicting responders and non-responders using PSDs. To our knowledge, this study provides the first empirical evidence that PSDs can be useful biomarkers for predicting the tDCS treatment response, and that a machine learning model can provide robust prediction performance. Machine learning models based on PSDs can be useful for informing treatment decisions in tDCS treatment for patients with PTSD
Audiology · Electroencephalography · Physical medicine and rehabilitation · Psychiatry · Stimulation · Support vector machine · Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation · Computer Science · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Medicine · Psychology · Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments · Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies · Artificial Intelligence · Internal Medicine
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Trauma and PTSD in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys
The development of a clinician‐administered PTSD scale
The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM–5 (Caps-5)
Eeglab
Identification of Major Psychiatric Disorders From Resting-State Electroencephalography Using a Machine Learning Approach
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |