Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Sex Differences Linking Pain-Related Fear and Interoceptive Hypervigilance

Attentional Biases to Conditioned Threat and Safety Signals in a Visceral Pain Model

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15522279
AutoresFranziska Labrenz (0000-0001-7284-3451, University of Duisburg-Essen), Sopiko Knuf-Rtveliashvili (University of Duisburg-Essen), Sigrid Elsenbruch (0000-0002-6528-2665, University of Duisburg-Essen, autor de correspondencia)
Año2020
Volumen11
Páginas197-197
Fecha de publicación2020-03-24
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaFrontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640
EditorialFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00197
PMID32265756
OpenAlexW3013234914
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas92

Although the broad role of fear and hypervigilance in conditions of the gut-brain axis like irritable bowel syndrome is supported by converging evidence, the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Even in healthy individuals, it remains unclear how pain-related fear may contribute to pain-related attentional biases for acute visceral pain. Building on our classical fear conditioning work in a clinically relevant model of visceral pain, we herein elucidated pain-related attentional biases shaped by associative learning in healthy women and men, aiming to elucidate possible sex differences and the role of psychological traits. To this end, we compared the impact of differentially conditioned pain-predictive cues on attentional biases in healthy women and men. Sixty-four volunteers accomplished a visual dot-probe task and subsequently underwent pain-related fear conditioning where one visual cue (CS + ) was contingently paired with a painful rectal distention (US) while another cue remained unpaired (CS - ). During the following test phase, the dot-probe task was repeated to investigate changes in attentional biases in response to differentially valenced cues. While pain-related learning was comparable between groups, men revealed more pronounced attentional engagement with the CS + and CS - whereas women demonstrated stronger difficulties to disengage from the CS + when presented with a neutral cue. However, when both CS + and CS - were presented together, women revealed stronger difficulties to disengage from the CS - . Regression analyses revealed an interaction of sex, with negative affect predicting stronger avoidance of the CS + and stronger difficulties to disengage attention from the CS - in men. These results provide first evidence that pain-related fear conditioning may induce attentional biases differentially in healthy women and men. Hence, sex differences may play a role in attentional mechanisms underlying hypervigilance, and may be modulated by psychological vulnerability factors relevant to chronic visceral pain

Anxiety · Attentional bias · Audiology · Cognition · Developmental psychology · Fear conditioning · Hypervigilance · Irritable bowel syndrome · Psychiatry · Gastrointestinal motility and disorders · Medicine · Neuroscience · Pain Management and Placebo Effect · Pain Mechanisms and Treatments · Psychology

  • Nocebo effects in visceral pain

    Open Access•Jana Aulenkamp, Jana Luisa Aulenkamp et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2023

  • Influence of Cognitive Orientation and Attentional Focus on Pain Perception

    Open Access•Pierluigi Diotaiuti, Stefano Corrado et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm

    Open Access•Ernst H W Koster, Geert Crombez et al.•Behaviour Research and Therapy•2004

  • Trail Making Test A and B

    Tom N Tombaugh, T Tombaugh•Archives of Clinical Neuropsycholog…•2004

  • Pain catastrophizing

    Phillip J Quartana, Claudia M Campbell et al.•Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics•2009

  • Attentional bias in emotional disorders.

    Colin Macleod, Andrew Mathews et al.•Journal of Abnormal Psychology•1986

  • Sex, Gender, and Pain

    Open Access•Roger B Fillingim, Christopher D King et al.•The Journal of Pain•2009

  • Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2009

  • From Anticipation to the Experience of Pain

    Laura Ricarda Koenen, Adriane Icenhour et al.•Psychosomatic Medicine•2018

  • Selective Processing of Gastrointestinal Symptom-related Stimuli in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

    Muhammad Afzal, John P Potokar et al.•Psychosomatic Medicine•2006

  • Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect

    David Watson, David C Watson et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1988

  • Safety first

    Julia Vogt, Ernst H W Koster et al.•Emotion•2016

  • Half a century of research on the Stroop effect

    Colin M Macleod•Psychological Bulletin•1991

  • Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals

    Yair Bar-Haim, Yair Bar‐haim et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2007

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,4
Intervalo de citas2021 - 2023 (3)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae