Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Evaluation and machine learning improvement of global hydrological model-based flood simulations

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15545708
AutoresTao Yang (0000-0003-0992-1992, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Fubao Sun (0000-0002-7439-8272, Chinese Academy of Sciences, autor de correspondencia), Pierre Gentine (0000-0002-0845-8345, Earth Island Institute), Wenbin Liu (0000-0003-0390-8455, Chinese Academy of Sciences, autor de correspondencia), Hong Wang (0000-0003-2405-7311, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Jiabo Yin (0000-0002-2305-8729, Wuhan University), M H Du (0000-0002-7291-5854, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Muye Du, Changming Liu (0000-0002-5188-012X, Chinese Academy of Sciences, autor de correspondencia)
Año2019
Volumen14
Número11
Páginas114027-114027
Fecha de publicación2019-10-14
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
EditorialIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ab4d5e
OpenAlexW2980361537
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas46

A warmer climate is expected to accelerate global hydrological cycle, causing more intense precipitation and floods. Despite recent progress in global flood risk assessment, the accuracy and improvement of global hydrological models (GHMs)-based flood simulation is insufficient for most applications. Here we compared flood simulations from five GHMs under the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project 2a (ISIMIP2a) protocol, against those calculated from 1032 gauging stations in the Global Streamflow Indices and Metadata Archive for the historical period 1971–2010. A machine learning approach, namely the long short-term memory units (LSTM) was adopted to improve the GHMs-based flood simulations within a hybrid physics- machine learning approach (using basin-averaged daily mean air temperature, precipitation, wind speed and the simulated daily discharge from GHMs-CaMa-Flood model chain as the inputs of LSTM, and observed daily discharge as the output value). We found that the GHMs perform reasonably well in terms of amplitude of peak discharge but are relatively poor in terms of their timing. The performance indicated great discrepancy under different climate zones. The large difference in performance between GHMs and observations reflected that those simulations require improvements. The LSTM used in combination with those GHMs was then shown to drastically improve the performance of global flood simulations (especially in terms of amplitude of peak discharge), suggesting that the combination of classical flood simulation and machine learning techniques might be a way forward for more robust and confident flood risk assessment

Climate change · Climate model · Climatology · Coupled model intercomparison project · Drainage basin · Flood forecasting · Flood myth · Global warming · Meteorology · Precipitation · Streamflow · Water cycle · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Hydrology and Drought Analysis · Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies · Geology

  • Challenges and opportunities in precision irrigation decision-support systems for center pivots

    Open Access•Jingwen Zhang, Kaiyu Guan et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Hybrid modeling of evapotranspiration

    Open Access•Reda ElGhawi, Basil Kraft et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2023

  • Effects of cryospheric hydrological processes on future flood inundation and the subsequent socioeconomic exposures in Central Asia

    Open Access•Ning Wang, Fubao Sun et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Global hydrological models continue to overestimate river discharge

    Open Access•Stefanie Heinicke, Jan Volkholz et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Extreme precipitation induced concurrent events trigger prolonged disruptions in regional road networks

    Open Access•Raviraj Dave, Srikrishnan Siva Subramanian et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Machine learning assisted hybrid models can improve streamflow simulation in diverse catchments across the conterminous US

    Open Access•Goutam Konapala, Shih‐Chieh Kao et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • A review of deep learning and machine learning techniques for hydrological inflow forecasting

    Open Access•Sarmad Dashti Latif, Ali Najah Ahmed•Environment Development and…•2023

  • The ERA‐Interim reanalysis

    Open Access•Dick Dee, D P Dee et al.•Quarterly Journal of the Royal…•2011

  • Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science

    Open Access•Markus Reichstein, Gustau Camps-Valls et al.•Nature•2019

  • A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models

    Open Access•Xu Liang, Dennis P Lettenmaier et al.•Journal of Geophysical Research:…•1994

  • Agricultural green and blue water consumption and its influence on the global water system

    Open Access•Stefanie Rost, Dieter Gerten et al.•Water Resources Research•2008

  • The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale

    Open Access•Nigel W Arnell, Simon N Gosling•Climatic Change•2016

  • Global depletion of groundwater resources

    Open Access•Yoshihide Wada, Ludovicus P H van Beek et al.•Geophysical Research Letters•2010

  • Long Short-Term Memory

    Sepp Hochreiter, Jurgen Schmidhuber•Neural Computation•1997

  • The critical role of the routing scheme in simulating peak river discharge in global hydrological models

    Open Access•Fang Zhao, Ted Veldkamp et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • Intercomparison of global river discharge simulations focusing on dam operation—multiple models analysis in two case-study river basins, Missouri–Mississippi and Green–Colorado

    Open Access•Yoshimitsu Masaki, Naota Hanasaki et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • Multimodel uncertainty changes in simulated river flows induced by human impact parameterizations

    Open Access•Xingcai Liu, Qiuhong Tang et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • Human impact parameterizations in global hydrological models improve estimates of monthly discharges and hydrological extremes

    Open Access•Ted Veldkamp, Fang Zhao et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Sources of uncertainty in hydrological climate impact assessment

    Open Access•Fred F Hattermann, Thomas Vetter et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

Obras citantes distintas7
Citas por año1,17
Intervalo de citas2020 - 2024 (5)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 7
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae