Effect on the Earth system of realizing a 1.5 °C warming climate target after overshooting to the 2 °C level
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15547136 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Kaoru Tachiiri (0009-0006-1726-5584, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, autor de correspondencia), Diego Silva Herran (0000-0001-5484-4442, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies), Xuanming Su (0000-0001-5595-3392, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology), Michio Kawamiya (0000-0001-7553-0522, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology) |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 14 |
| Número | 12 |
| Páginas | 124063-124063 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-10-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Environmental Research Letters (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326 |
| Editorial | IOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/ab5199 |
| OpenAlex | W2982553529 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 44 |
An Earth system model (ESM) was used to investigate the effect of reaching the target of 1.5 °C warming (relative to preindustrial levels) after overshooting to the 2 °C level with respect to selected global environment indicators. Two scenarios were compared that diverged after reaching the 2 °C level: one stayed at the 2 °C level, and the other cooled to the 1.5 °C level. Unlike the internationally coordinated model intercomparison projects, the scenarios were developed for a specific climatic model with emissions and land use scenarios consistent with socioeconomic projections from an integrated assessment model. The ESM output resulted in delayed realization of the 1.5 °C and 2 °C targets expected for 2100. The cumulative CO 2 emissions for 2010−2100 (2300) were 358 (−53) GtCO 2 in the 2 °C scenario and −337 (−936) GtCO 2 in the 1.5 °C scenario. We examined the effect of overshooting on commonly used indicators related to surface air temperature, sea surface temperature and total ocean heat uptake. Global vegetation productivity at 2100 showed around a 5% increase in the 2 °C scenario without overshooting compared with the 1.5 °C scenario with overshooting, considered to be caused by more precipitation and stronger CO 2 fertilization. A considerable difference was found between the two scenarios in terms of Arctic sea ice, whereas both scenarios indicated few corals would survive past the 21st century. The difference in steric sea level rise, reflecting total cumulative ocean heat uptake, between the two scenarios was <2 cm in 2100, and around 9 cm in 2300 in the Pacific Island region. A large overshoot may reduce the eventual difference between targets (i.e. 1.5 °C in contrast to 2 °C), particularly in terms of the indicators related to total ocean heat uptake, and to sensitive biological thresholds
Arctic · Atmospheric sciences · Climate change · Climate model · Climatology · Coupled model intercomparison project · Earth system science · Geography · Global warming · Meteorology · Physical geography · Precipitation · Representative Concentration Pathways · Sea ice · Sea level · Sea surface temperature · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · Climate variability and models · Environmental Science · Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses · Geology · Oceanography
Contrasting futures for ocean and society from different anthropogenic CO 2 emissions scenarios
Rcp2.6
Differential climate impacts for policy-relevant limits to global warming
Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C
Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, Magicc6 – Part 1
Rcp4.5
The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6
Meeting global temperature targets—the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage
The effectiveness of net negative carbon dioxide emissions in reversing anthropogenic climate change
How do climate-related uncertainties influence 2 and 1.5 °C pathways
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,25 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |