Assessing the tradeoffs in emissions, air quality and health benefits from excess power generation due to climate-related policies for the transportation sector

As the transportation sector continues to decarbonize through electrification, there is growing interest in quantifying potential tradeoffs in air pollution and health impacts due to potential excess emissions from the power sector. This study investigates air pollution and health impacts of policy-driven changes in the transportation sector and the associated power generation demand in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic United States. Five illustrative scenarios were designed to capture the effects of different policies under the first mandatory market-based program to reduce greenhouse gases in the US power sector (Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative—RGGI) and the Transportation and Climate Initiative (TCI). Considering future power generation with new renewable energy investments to meet demands from decarbonized transportation, the scenarios were framed using: 1. 2030 reference cases for both sectors and a hybrid TCI portfolio, 2. Departure from the reference cases defined by Pennsylvania included or not in RGGI, and 3. Power grid emissions estimated under clean energy standard (CES) policy and hybrid TCI portfolio. While the cross-sectoral policy effect on domain-wide concentrations is modest (max ΔPM 2.5 ∼ 0.06 μ g m 3 , ΔNO 2 ∼ 0.3 ppbv, ΔO 3 ∼ 0.15 ppbv), substantial increases in Ohio and West Virginia were attributed to Pennsylvania joining RGGI. With CES enacted and Pennsylvania in RGGI, significant reductions are seen in average concentrations (max ΔPM 2.5 ∼ 1.2 μ g m 3 , ΔNO 2 ∼ 1.1 ppbv, ΔO 3 ∼ 1.7 ppbv) except for Louisiana and Mississippi with corresponding disbenefits. When focusing exclusively on emissions reductions from transportation, the hybrid TCI portfolio had health benefits of 530 avoided adult deaths, and 46 000 avoided asthma exacerbations. With a ‘business as usual’ power grid, these benefits remain comparable and are mainly driven by NO 2 , followed by PM 2.5 and O 3 . However, if Pennsylvania joins RGGI, total health benefits and spatial distribution change substantially, with a large portion of adverse health impacts moving from TCI states to Ohio and West Virginia. The overall monetized impact of a CES scenario can substantially exceed the estimated average range of 66–69 Billion US$, depending on the interaction with transportation decarbonization strategies and other drivers of exposure

Air quality index · Climate change · Climate policy · Economics · Environmental economics · Geography · Meteorology · Natural resource economics · Quality (philosophy · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Environmental Science · Vehicle emissions and performance

• Focus on health-centred climate solutions

  Open Access•Jianxiang Shen, Wenjia Cai et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  Añadir item

• Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial–ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure

  Open Access•Christopher W Tessum, Joshua S Apte et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2019

  Añadir item

• Air pollution exposure disparities across US population and income groups

  Open Access•Abdulrahman Jbaily, Xiaodan Zhou et al.•Nature•2022

  Añadir item

• Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution

  C Arden Pope, Douglas W Dockery•Journal of the Air & Waste…•2006

  Añadir item

• Long-Term Ozone Exposure and Mortality

  Michael Jerrett, Richard T Burnett et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•2009

  Añadir item

• Disparities in PM 2.5 air pollution in the United States

  Open Access•Jonathan Colmer, Ian Hardman et al.•Science•2020

  Añadir item

• Emissions projections for US utilities through 2050

  Open Access•Emily Grubert•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  Añadir item

• Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time

  Open Access•Florian Knobloch, Steef V Hanssen et al.•Nature Sustainability•2020

  Añadir item