Reported writing in court

Putting evidence “on record”

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15672425
AutoresFleur Van Der Houwen (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, autor de correspondencia)
Año2013
Volumen33
Número6
Fecha de publicación2013-01-25
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaText and Talk (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1860-7330 • E-ISSN: 1860-7349
EditorialDe Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/text-2013-0032
OpenAlexW2136177731
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5

This paper examines how "reported writing" is sequentially embedded in Dutch criminal trials. In the Dutch criminal court, because of its inquisitorial nature, judges have an active role. They interview the suspect during the hearing and while doing so they frequently read from the case file. The case file consists of various documents that have been drawn up in the preliminary investigations, such as police records of suspect and witness statements. The statements are not read out loud in their entirety, but fragments are selected and woven into the courtroom discourse. The case file plays an important role because, according to the immediacy principle, the judge's verdict must be based on the information and documents that have been dealt with during the trial. In the context of examining the evidence in the courtroom, this paper illustrates how judges embed fragments from a document that they choose to read out loud, in order to establish the facts. Furthermore, this paper shows how reported writing allows the judge to assign turns to and animate "written voices," and make those words a part of the courtroom interaction and hence the reconstruction of what happened

Context (archaeology · Criminal investigation · Epistemology · Immediacy · Impeachment · Order (exchange · Political science · Suspect · Verdict · Witness · Computer Science · Criminal Law and Evidence · History · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal Language and Interpretation · Psychology