A short response to van Lente, Swierstra and Joly’s essay ‘Responsible innovation as a critique of technology assessment’
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15735862 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michael Nentwich (0000-0003-2269-0076, Institute of Technology Assessment, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2017 |
| Volumen | 4 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 262-267 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2017-05-04 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Responsible Innovation (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2329-9037 • E-ISSN: 2329-9460 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23299460.2017.1325698 |
| OpenAlex | W2612314806 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 10 |
I set out to read this thought experiment by van Lente, Swierstra, and Joly (2017) as a constructive critique of technology assessment (TA) with a view towards making TA better suited to the needs
Constructive · Epistemology · Political science · Process (computing · Public relations · Responsible Research and Innovation · Set (abstract data type · Sociology · Computer Science · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development · Philosophy · Service and Product Innovation · Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Entangled futures and responsibilities in technology assessment
Imagining socio-technical futures – challenges and opportunities for technology assessment
Ends of responsible innovation
Two tribes or more? The historical emergence of discourse coalitions of responsible research and innovation (rri) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)
| Citas por año | 0,44 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Altamente citado | No |