What Should We Do About the Mismatch Between Legal Criteria for Death and How Brain Death Is Diagnosed
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15744344 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Nathaniel M Robbins (0000-0002-1884-8275, Dartmouth College, autor de correspondencia), James L Bernat (0000-0003-1128-0442, Dartmouth College) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 22 |
| Número | 12 |
| Páginas | E1038-1046 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980 |
| Editorial | American Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2020.1038 |
| PMID | 33419505 |
| OpenAlex | W3108892655 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 6 |
Mismatch between whole-brain death criteria embedded in statutes and accepted tests physicians use to diagnose brain death have clinical and ethical implications that could undermine public trust in death pronouncements. We consider merits and drawbacks of 4 ways to address this problem
Cause of death · Disease · Pathology · Political science · Statute · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Law · Medicine · Organ Donation and Transplantation · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Psychology
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |