Why Health Professionals Should Speak Out Against False Beliefs on the Internet
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15744985 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Joel T Wu (Abbott Northwestern Hospital, autor de correspondencia), Jennifer B Mccormick (0000-0002-2008-8180, American Society of Human Genetics) |
| Año | 2018 |
| Volumen | 20 |
| Número | 11 |
| Páginas | E1052-1058 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2018-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980 |
| Editorial | American Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2018.1052 |
| PMID | 30499434 |
| OpenAlex | W2898702200 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 9 |
| Referencias citadas | 3 |
Broad dissemination and consumption of false or misleading health information, amplified by the internet, poses risks to public health and problems for both the health care enterprise and the government. In this article, we review government power for, and constitutional limits on, regulating health-related speech, particularly on the internet. We suggest that government regulation can only partially address false or misleading health information dissemination. Drawing on the American Medical Association's Code of Medical Ethics , we argue that health care professionals have responsibilities to convey truthful information to patients, peers, and communities. Finally, we suggest that all health care professionals have essential roles in helping patients and fellow citizens obtain reliable, evidence-based health information
Business · Ethical code · Government (linguistics · Health care · Health information · Health professionals · Internet privacy · Political science · Power (physics · Public health · Public relations · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Law · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Nursing · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Psychology · Health Policy
The paradox of self-efficacy
How do (false) positively screened patients experience a screening programme for liver cirrhosis or fibrosis in Germany? A qualitative study
How Should State Licensing and Credentialing Boards Respond When Government Clinicians Spread False or Misleading Health Information
A Pilot Study of Medical Misinformation Perceptions and Training Among Practitioners in North Carolina (USA)
How Pseudoscience Generated US Material and Device Regulations
Why Should Clinicians Care About Infectious Disease Existential Hazards
How Should Physicians Respond When They Learn Patients Are Using Unapproved Gene Editing Interventions
Addressing Misinformation
Here we go again
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,29 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2019 - 2025 (7) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 9 |