Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The United States and the Strategic Dimensions of the Marshall Plan

Datos Bibliográficos

ID16530751
AutoresMelvyn P Leffler (0000-0001-8327-7125, autor de correspondencia)
Año1988
Volumen12
Número3
Páginas277-306
Fecha de publicación1988-07-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaDiplomatic History (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0145-2096 • E-ISSN: 1467-7709
EditorialOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-7709.1988.tb00477.x
OpenAlexW2037224859
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas15
Referencias citadas7

The purpose of this article is to examine the geopolitical, strategic, and military implications and ramifications of the Marshall Plan. Although American officials hoped the Marshall Plan would benefit the American economy, they also wanted to redress the European balance of power and to enhance American national security. By national security, American officials meant the control of raw materials, industrial infrastructure, skilled manpower, and military bases. And from their viewpoint, the most fundamental strategic interest of the United States was to prevent any potential adversary or coalition of adversaries from mobilizing the resources and economic-military potential of Europe for war-making purposes against the United States.1 In this context, American policymakers had two major objectives and one minor one in launching the Marshall Plan in June 1947. First, they wanted to spawn economic recovery in Western and Southern Europe, undermine the appeal of Communist parties, and thereby circumscribe the latent influence and power of the Kremlin. Second, American officials sought to revive the western zones of Germany and to integrate them into a Western economic and political orbit. Third, and much less central than the preceding two goals, American Marshall Planners hoped to drive a wedge into the emerging Soviet bloc of satellite states in Eastern Europe. Only by accomplishing these aims, especially the two major goals enumerated above, could American officials thwart the Soviet Union's capacity to harness Europe's industrial and military potential for its own purposes

Cold war · Communism · Geopolitics · Marshall Plan · National security · Peacetime · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Law · Post-Communist Economic and Political Transition · Public Administration · Russia and Soviet political economy

  • Recalcitrance and initiative

    Arthur A Stein•International Relations of the…•2013

  • From War to Global Peace Strategist

    Open Access•Joe Majerus•International Journal of Military…•2021

  • Ngabulâ Vis-À-Vis Modernity

    Open Access•Fera Andriani Djakfar, Puspita Ayu Permatasari•KARSA Journal of Social and…•2020

  • Infrastructure as a diplomatic tool

    Open Access•Wilton Dias•Revista Brasileira de Política…•2025

  • Hotspot Geopolitics

    Open Access•Mher D Sahakyan, Karl Lo•Chinese Political Science Review•2025

  • America’s Marshall Plan and China’s One Belt and One Road Initiative

    Sung Hee Ru•Comparative Sociology•2023

  • The Tragedy of American Diplomacy? Rethinking the Marshall Plan

    Michael Cox, Caroline Kennedy‐pipe•Journal of Cold War Studies•2005

  • The Marshall Plan and oil

    David S Painter•Cold War History•2009

  • Neoclassical realism and international climate change politics

    Open Access•Mark Purdon•Journal of International…•2013

  • The ‘Big Three’ and the division of Europe, 1945–48

    David Reynolds, David O Reynolds•Diplomacy and Statecraft•1990

  • Ghostly evidence

    Leslie G Roman, Leslie Roman•International Journal of…•2003

  • European strategic autonomy as a double-edged sword? US perspectives in an Era of Sino-American competition

    Open Access•Linde Desmaele•Journal of European Integration•2025

  • Bound to Fail

    John J Mearsheimer•International Security•2019

  • Confronting Soviet Power

    Paul C Avey•International Security•2012

  • Asia, Europe, North America, and the “Asian Capitalist Miracle

    Open Access•Gustav Schmidt•International Political Science…•2003

  • The First American Commitment in Indochina

    Gary R Hess•Diplomatic History•1978

  • The Truman Administration and the Restoration of French Sovereignty in Indochina

    George C Herring•Diplomatic History•1977

  • The Triangular Route to Vietnam

    Andrew J Rotter•The International History Review•1984

  • The 1949 sterling crisis and British policy towards European integration

    Open Access•Scott Newton•Review of International Studies•1985

  • Return to Dunkirk

    Sean Greenwood•Journal of Strategic Studies•1983

  • Prologue to the Marshall Plan

    Scott Jackson, Scott A Jackson•Journal of American History•1979

Obras citantes distintas15
Citas por año0,42
Intervalo de citas1990 - 2025 (36)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 15
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae