Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

A Missed Opportunity for Clarity

Problems in the Reporting of Effect Size Estimates in Infant Developmental Science

Datos Bibliográficos

ID16782872
AutoresLaura Mills‐Smith (0000-0001-7979-9457, Virginia Tech, autor de correspondencia), Derek P Spangler (0000-0001-7172-9083, Virginia Tech, autor de correspondencia), Robin Panneton (0000-0001-6519-8319, Virginia Tech), Matthew S Fritz (0000-0002-5885-6341, University of Nebraska–Lincoln)
Año2015
Volumen20
Número4
Páginas416-432
Fecha de publicación2015-07-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInfancy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1525-0008 • E-ISSN: 1532-7078
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/infa.12078
OpenAlexW2066219379
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas23

Several years ago, the American Psychological Association began requiring that effect size estimates be reported to provide a better indication of the associative strength between factors and dependent measures in empirical studies ( Publication manual of the American Psychological Association , 2010, Author, Washington, DC). Accordingly, developmental journals require/strongly recommend effect size estimates be included in published work. Potentially, this trend has important benefits for infancy research given some of the inherent difficulties in establishing conceptually strong findings when often facing highly variable performance in typically small samples. This study examined recent infant research from select journals for accuracy and interpretative value of effect size estimates. Demographics, sample size, design, and statistical data were coded from 158 published (2007–2012) articles presenting 878 effect size estimates from experimental findings with infants using behavioral methods. Descriptive and distribution statistics were calculated for the following variables: (1) statistical tests, (2) effect size parameters, and (3) effect size interpretations. Although partial eta squared ( ) and eta squared ( η 2 ) were most common (49 and 42%, respectively), “ η confusion” was apparent, and interpretation of effect size estimates was virtually nonexistent. Thus, effect size estimates are not impacting infant development research in spite of criticisms of sole dependence on null hypothesis (e.g. American Psychologist , 49, 1994 and 997). Suggestions for increasing accuracy of effect size estimate selection and interpretative effect size estimate cutoffs are offered to improve empirical clarity

CLARITY · Econometrics · Null hypothesis · Sample size determination · Statistical hypothesis testing · Statistics · Cognitive Abilities and Testing · Mathematics · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing

  • Quantifying Sources of Variability in Infancy Research Using the Infant-Directed-Speech Preference

    Open Access•Michael C Frank, Katie Alcock et al.•Advances in Methods and Practices…•2020

  • Development of infants' segmentation of words from native speech

    Open Access•Christina Bergmann, Alejandrina Cristia•Developmental Science•2015

  • Nonsuicidal self-injury and identity formation in Indian clinical and nonclinical samples

    Open Access•Amarendra Gandhi, K Luyckx et al.•International Journal of Social…•2021

  • Individual differences in infancy research

    Open Access•Koraly E Pérez‐edgar, Alicia Vallorani et al.•Infancy•2020

  • Infant Perception and Cognition

    Open Access•John Colombo, Caitlin C Brez et al.•Handbook of Psychology, Second…•2012

  • How to Estimate and Interpret Various Effect Sizes.

    Tammi Vacha-Haase, Tammi Vacha‐haase et al.•Journal of Counseling Psychology•2004

  • Generalized Eta and Omega Squared Statistics

    Stephen Olejnik, James Algina•Psychological Methods•2003

  • Effect size estimates

    Catherine O Fritz, Peter E Morris et al.•Journal of Experimental…•2012

  • Eta Squared, Partial Eta Squared, and Misreporting of Effect Size in Communication Research

    Open Access•Timothy R Levine, Craig R Hullett•Human Communication Research•2002

  • If Statistical Significance Tests are Broken/Misused, What Practices Should Supplement or Replace Them

    Open Access•Bruce Thompson•Theory & Psychology•1999

  • Practical Significance

    Open Access•Roger E Kirk•Educational and Psychological…•1996

  • A History of Effect Size Indices

    Open Access•Carl J Huberty•Educational and Psychological…•2002

  • Cautionary Note on Reporting Eta-Squared Values from Multifactor Anova Designs

    Open Access•Charles A E Pierce, Charles A Pierce et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2004

  • Eta-Squared and Partial Eta-Squared in Fixed Factor Anova Designs

    Open Access•Jacob Cohen•Educational and Psychological…•1973

  • The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research

    Jacob Cohen•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1962

  • The earth is round (p < .05)

    Jacob Cohen•American Psychologist•1994

  • Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal•American Psychologist•1989

  • Statistical methods in psychology journals

    Leland Wilkinson, Task Force on Statistical Inference•American Psychologist•1999

  • A power primer

    Jacob Cohen•Psychological Bulletin•1992

  • When small effects are impressive

    Deborah A Prentice, Dale T Miller•Psychological Bulletin•1992

Obras citantes distintas4
Citas por año0,36
Intervalo de citas2015 - 2021 (7)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae