Family Assessment in Child Welfare Services
Instrument Comparisons
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 16807476 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michelle A Johnson (0000-0001-7700-936X, University of California System), Susan Stone (0000-0003-0243-3048, University of California System), Christine Lou (University of California System), Catherine M Vu (0000-0002-1815-787X, University of California System), Jennifer Ling (University of California System), Paola Mizrahi (University of California System), Michael J Austin (0000-0002-0087-6841, University of California System) |
| Año | 2008 |
| Volumen | 5 |
| Número | 1-2 |
| Páginas | 57-90 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2008-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1543-3714 • E-ISSN: 1543-3722 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1300/j394v05n01_04 |
| PMID | 19064445 |
| OpenAlex | W2073660564 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 12 |
| Referencias citadas | 34 |
Family assessment instruments can enhance the clinical judgment of child welfare practitioners by structuring decision-making processes and demonstrating the linkages between assessment, service provision, and child and family outcomes. This article describes the concept of family assessment in the child welfare context and provides an overview of the theoretical and disciplinary influences in the family assessment field. Based on a structured review of 85 instruments, the article discusses 21 that appear to the be the most valid and reliable for evaluating four federally-defined domains of family assessment: (1) patterns of social interaction, (2) parenting practices, (3) background and history of the parents or caregivers, and (4) problems in access to basic necessities such as income, employment, and adequate housing. Key measurement criteria as well as practical considerations in the selection and implementation of family assessment instrumentation in child welfare are discussed
Business · Economics · Market economy · Political science · Social Welfare · Welfare · Child Abuse and Trauma · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Family and Disability Support Research · Law
Overview of Confucianism and the Basic Content of Confucianism
Innovative Practice Approaches to Matching in Adoption
An item response theory investigation of the Family Assessment Form
The Challenge of Targeting Services
How Good Are Child Vulnerability Assessment Tools in China
Psychometric Properties of the Trauma and Post-Trauma Well-Being Assessment Domains of the North Carolina Family Assessment Scale for General and Reunification Services (NCFAS G+R)
Overview of Out-of-Home Placements and Placement Decision-Making in Child Welfare
Social work practitioners' experience of the clinical utility of the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (Home) Inventory
Psychometric Properties of the Home Inventory Using Rasch Analysis
North Carolina Family Assessment Scale
Standards and Constructs in the Child Welfare Case File
Accomplishing family reunification for children in care
Handbook of family measurement techniques
Families under stress
Assessing physical child abuse risk
Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems
Family Assessment Measure (FAM) and Process Model of Family Functioning
The McMaster Model of Family Functioning
The McMaster Approach to Families
The Beavers Systems Model of Family Functioning
Development of a Family Assessment Instrument for Transcultural Use
The home observation for measurement of the environment (Home) scale
The Reliability and Validity of the North Carolina Family Assessment Scale
Assessment of Family Functioning in Chinese Adolescents
The Family Stress Process
Measuring Child Care
The Parental Empathy Measure
A Multivariate Test of the Bott Hypothesis in an Urban Irish Setting
Stress, Coping and Adaptation to New Parenthood
Advances in the Reliability and Validity of the North Carolina Family Assessment Scale
| Obras citantes distintas | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,71 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2009 - 2026 (18) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |