Bird Use of Northern Alaska Oilfield Rehabilitation Sites
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 16865708 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Rebecca Bentzen (Wildlife Conservation Society, autor de correspondencia), Joe Liebezeit (National Audubon Society), Martin D Robards (0009-0008-3805-0114, Wildlife Conservation Society), Martin Robards, Bill Streever, Samantha Strindberg (0000-0002-4634-8593, Wildlife Conservation Society), Steve Zack (Wildlife Conservation Society) |
| Año | 2018 |
| Volumen | 71 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 422-430 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2018-12-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | ARCTIC (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0004-0843 • E-ISSN: 1923-1245 |
| Editorial | The Arctic Institute of North America (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.14430/arctic4747 |
| OpenAlex | W2905374077 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 6 |
Breeding bird response to habitat rehabilitation after anthropogenic disturbance has received little attention in the Arctic. The North Slope of Alaska is an important breeding ground for many populations of migratory birds and has also supported major oilfields since the late 1960s. The most obvious impacts of industrial development to nesting birds are direct habitat loss and fragmentation resulting from the construction of infrastructure, along with increased mechanical noise, vehicle traffic, and other forms of anthropogenic disturbance. In response to state and federal requirements, efforts have been made to rehabilitate abandoned portions of the oilfields. We compared bird use at rehabilitation sites and at nearby paired reference sites. Densities of shorebirds and passerines varied between rehabilitation sites and reference sites, but waterfowl densities did not. Specifically, passerine and shorebird densities were higher at reference sites in the early or mid-season and lower at reference sites in the late season. Additionally, birds on rehabilitation sites were primarily observed foraging and resting, while behavior observed on paired reference sites was more diverse and included courtship displays, nesting, and aggression. Further, rehabilitation sites supported significantly fewer nests and fewer species than recorded at reference sites. Our findings suggest that sites 3 to 10 years post rehabilitation do not provide bird habitat comparable to nearby reference sites and, by extension, do not provide shorebird and passerine habitat comparable to that found prior to development. However, rehabilitation sites appear to provide adequate habitat for waterfowl and are important to shorebirds and passerines as foraging areas. Continued monitoring will be needed to establish the long-term suitability of rehabilitation sites, compared to reference sites, as breeding habitat for birds
Biology · Disturbance (geology) · Foraging · Geography · Habitat · Nesting season · Passerine · Seasonal breeder · Waterfowl · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Avian ecology and behavior · Ecology · Fire effects on ecosystems
Distance software
Recovery of Tundra Vegetation Three Decades after Hydrocarbon Drilling with and without Seeding of Non-Native Grasses + Supplementary Appendices (See Article Tools)
Six Strategies for Rehabilitating Land Disturbed by Oil Development in Arctic Alaska
Evaluation of Percent Cover Requirements for Revegetation of Disturbed Sites on Alaska's North Slope
Shorebirds Breed in Unusually High Densities in the Teshekpuk Lake Special Area, Alaska
Distribution of Breeding Shorebirds on the Arctic Coastal Plain of Alaska
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,13 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2018 - 2018 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |