Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Bird Use of Northern Alaska Oilfield Rehabilitation Sites

Datos Bibliográficos

ID16865708
AutoresRebecca Bentzen (Wildlife Conservation Society, autor de correspondencia), Joe Liebezeit (National Audubon Society), Martin D Robards (0009-0008-3805-0114, Wildlife Conservation Society), Martin Robards, Bill Streever, Samantha Strindberg (0000-0002-4634-8593, Wildlife Conservation Society), Steve Zack (Wildlife Conservation Society)
Año2018
Volumen71
Número4
Páginas422-430
Fecha de publicación2018-12-19
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaARCTIC (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0004-0843 • E-ISSN: 1923-1245
EditorialThe Arctic Institute of North America (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.14430/arctic4747
OpenAlexW2905374077
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas6

Breeding bird response to habitat rehabilitation after anthropogenic disturbance has received little attention in the Arctic. The North Slope of Alaska is an important breeding ground for many populations of migratory birds and has also supported major oilfields since the late 1960s. The most obvious impacts of industrial development to nesting birds are direct habitat loss and fragmentation resulting from the construction of infrastructure, along with increased mechanical noise, vehicle traffic, and other forms of anthropogenic disturbance. In response to state and federal requirements, efforts have been made to rehabilitate abandoned portions of the oilfields. We compared bird use at rehabilitation sites and at nearby paired reference sites. Densities of shorebirds and passerines varied between rehabilitation sites and reference sites, but waterfowl densities did not. Specifically, passerine and shorebird densities were higher at reference sites in the early or mid-season and lower at reference sites in the late season. Additionally, birds on rehabilitation sites were primarily observed foraging and resting, while behavior observed on paired reference sites was more diverse and included courtship displays, nesting, and aggression. Further, rehabilitation sites supported significantly fewer nests and fewer species than recorded at reference sites. Our findings suggest that sites 3 to 10 years post rehabilitation do not provide bird habitat comparable to nearby reference sites and, by extension, do not provide shorebird and passerine habitat comparable to that found prior to development. However, rehabilitation sites appear to provide adequate habitat for waterfowl and are important to shorebirds and passerines as foraging areas. Continued monitoring will be needed to establish the long-term suitability of rehabilitation sites, compared to reference sites, as breeding habitat for birds

Biology · Disturbance (geology) · Foraging · Geography · Habitat · Nesting season · Passerine · Seasonal breeder · Waterfowl · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Avian ecology and behavior · Ecology · Fire effects on ecosystems

  • The Arctic Guide

    Open Access•David W Norton•ARCTIC•2018

  • Distance software

    Open Access•Len Thomas, Stephen T Buckland et al.•Journal of Applied Ecology•2010

  • Recovery of Tundra Vegetation Three Decades after Hydrocarbon Drilling with and without Seeding of Non-Native Grasses + Supplementary Appendices (See Article Tools)

    Open Access•Nicole B Kearns, Mélanie Jean et al.•ARCTIC•2015

  • Six Strategies for Rehabilitating Land Disturbed by Oil Development in Arctic Alaska

    Open Access•M Torre Jorgenson, Michael R Joyce•ARCTIC•1994

  • Evaluation of Percent Cover Requirements for Revegetation of Disturbed Sites on Alaska's North Slope

    Open Access•W J Streever, William Streever et al.•ARCTIC•2003

  • Shorebirds Breed in Unusually High Densities in the Teshekpuk Lake Special Area, Alaska

    Open Access•Brad A Andres, James A Johnson et al.•ARCTIC•2012

  • Distribution of Breeding Shorebirds on the Arctic Coastal Plain of Alaska

    Open Access•James A Johnson, Richard B Lanctot et al.•ARCTIC•2009

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,13
Intervalo de citas2018 - 2018 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae