Democratizing Artificial Intelligence for Social Good
A Bibliometric–Systematic Review Through a Social Science Lens
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 16901351 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Chitat Chan (0000-0003-4674-9597), Afifah Nurrosyidah (0000-0003-2678-5435) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 14 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 30 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-01-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760 |
| Editorial | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/socsci14010030 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 85 |
This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the opportunities for democratizing artificial intelligence (AI) for social good using a bibliometric–systematic literature review method. It combines the quantitative analysis of bibliometric methods with the qualitative synthesis of systematic reviews. This approach helps identify patterns, trends, and gaps in the literature, advancing theoretical insights and mapping future research directions. Design/methodology/approach: Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, as prominent scientific databases, were utilized to examine publications between 2014 and 2024. The article selection followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The bibliometric analysis was conducted using CiteSpace software. Findings: The bibliometric analysis identified the most influential articles, journals, countries, authors, and key themes. The systematic thematic analysis identified established modes of using AI for social good. Moreover, future research directions are suggested and discussed in this article. Practical implications: The findings give future research directions and guidance to academics, practitioners, and policymakers for real-world applications
The Sage Handbook of Interview Research
Explanation in artificial intelligence
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
Guidelines for Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Reviews
Generative AI in Education and Research
How to design bibliometric research
How AI capabilities enable business model innovation
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Exploring the effects of AI literacy in teacher learning
The political and social contradictions of the human and online environment in the context of artificial intelligence applications
Ready but irresponsible? Analysis of the Government Artificial Intelligence Readiness Index
Emerging Consensus on ‘Ethical AI’
Responsible nudging for social good
How to Design AI for Social Good
Not All AI are Equal
AI governance in the public sector
Against “Democratizing AI”
AI in the headlines
AI for the public. How public interest theory shifts the discourse on AI
Artificial intelligence, transparency, and public decision-making
Modeling AI Trust for 2050
AI ageism
Out of the laboratory and into the classroom
Investing in AI for social good
Openness and privacy in born-digital archives
AI Ethics for Sustainable Development Goals
Harmonizing Artificial Intelligence for Social Good
In the Frame
Recommendations for Social Work Researchers and Journal Editors on the Use of Generative AI and Large Language Models
Sociological perspectives on artificial intelligence
A Call to Action on Artificial Intelligence and Social Work Education
The Practice and Science of Social Good
Artificial Intelligence and Inclusion
Beyond ‘AI for Social Good’ (AI4SG)
Ethical’ artificial intelligence in the welfare state
Rethinking creativity
Artificial intelligence and sustainable development goals nexus via four vantage points
Problematising Artificial Intelligence in Social Work Education
Unavoidable futures? How governments articulate sociotechnical imaginaries of AI and healthcare services
Searching for inclusive artificial intelligence for social good
Democratization in the age of artificial intelligence
Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |