Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment

Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform

Datos Bibliográficos

ID17536179
AutoresTim Holland (0009-0002-5657-9958), And Tiffany O'Donnell, Tiffany O'Donnell
Año2026
Volumen56
Número3
Páginas28-29
Fecha de publicación2026-05-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Hastings Center Report (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0093-0334 • E-ISSN: 1552-146X
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/hast.70061
PMID42090178
OpenAlexW7160445301
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas7

In this same, May-June 2026, issue of the Hastings Center Report, Brendon Saloner suggests that mandated drug treatment can expand freedom and promote egalitarian social justice so long as three criteria are met. Drawing on our clinical experience in addiction medicine and a critical appraisal of the available evidence, we challenge this claim. We argue that Saloner's three criteria are unlikely to be met within jurisdictions that criminalize drug use and lack supports for people who use drugs. The criterion that mandated treatment be "likely to be beneficial" is undermined by the coercive nature of such interventions and the lack of evidence supporting their effectiveness when compared to voluntary care. Further, the application of mandated treatment risks extending carceral oversight to individuals charged with minor offenses, disproportionately affecting equity-denied populations. Finally, we question whether infringements on liberty through legal oversight can genuinely expand freedom, particularly when such measures exacerbate social instability and undermine the potential for voluntary engagement with care. We contend that meaningful expansion of freedom for people who use drugs is better achieved through voluntary, community-based treatment models supported by robust social infrastructure. A radical reorientation of drug policy-away from coercion and toward supportive, person-centered care-is necessary to achieve the ethical aims of reducing harm, promoting autonomy, and advancing egalitarian social justice

Addiction · Coercion (linguistics) · Criminal justice · Economic Justice · Legislature · Psychological intervention · Social policy · Unintended consequences · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Opioid Use Disorder Treatment

  • Meta‐analysis of drug‐related deaths soon after release from prison

    Open Access•Elizabeth L C Merrall, Elizabeth Merrall et al.•Addiction•2010

  • Mandated Drug Treatment in the Criminal Legal System—a Blunt but Necessary Tool

    Open Access•Brendan Saloner•The Hastings Center Report•2026

  • The effectiveness of compulsory drug treatment

    Open Access•Dan Werb, A Kamarulzaman et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2016

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae