Project Relate
A randomized clinical trial of a digital single-session romantic competence intervention
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 17560248 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Atina Manvelian (0000-0002-5713-5083, Stony Brook University, autor de correspondencia), Ian Sotomayor (0000-0002-7438-1462, Stony Brook University), Isaac Ahuvia (0000-0003-4558-2123, Stony Brook University), Emily S Bibby (0000-0002-6398-1489, Stony Brook University), Joanne Davila (0000-0003-1250-5068, Stony Brook University), Jessica Schleider (Stony Brook University) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-01-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Journal of Behavioral Development (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0165-0254 • E-ISSN: 1464-0651 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/01650254251414337 |
| OpenAlex | W7125531247 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 26 |
Youth begin to make difficult decisions about romantic relationships in emerging adulthood; yet, most relationship education programs only target adults in existing relationships and are delivered in-person, creating dissemination barriers. Online single-session interventions (SSIs) can expand intervention access, teaching youth evidence-based relational skills early on. In the present study, we adapted an evidence-based romantic competence workshop into a digital SSI for emerging adults. A large, diverse sample of emerging adults ( N = 802) experiencing depressive symptoms was recruited via social media and randomly assigned to one of two conditions: the intervention condition, called “Project Relate,” focused on teaching youth relationship skills (e.g., insight, communication, or decision-making), and the information-only control group provided psychoeducation without skill-building. Youth were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months later. Results indicated high intervention acceptability but no statistically significant differences between conditions. Across both conditions, youth reported improvements in depression, anxiety, relationship knowledge, relationship decision-making, hopelessness, and loneliness ( ds ranging from .19 to -1.68); youth also noted qualitative improvements in relationship skills across both conditions. Findings suggest that both information-only and skills-based digital SSIs may improve relational and psychological functioning for emerging adults. NCT05722574 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05722574 ); Project Relate: Romantic Relationship Competence SSI
Loneliness · Positive Youth Development · Psychoeducation · Psychological intervention · Randomized controlled trial · Relationship education · Romance · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Sexual function and dysfunction studies
A single‐session growth mindset intervention for adolescent anxiety and depression
The Association of Adverse Childhood Experiences With Anxiety and Depression for Children and Youth, 8 to 17 Years of Age
Social Relationships and Depression
The association between social relationships and depression
Romantic relationships and mental health
Testing the ruler with item response theory
Controlling the False Discovery Rate
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder
The PHQ-9
Ucla Loneliness Scale (Version 3)
Romantic competence, healthy relationship functioning, and well‐being in emerging adults
Teaching romantic competence skills to emerging adults
Long-Term Risks and Possible Benefits Associated with Late Adolescent Romantic Relationship Quality
Proposal for a Short Version of the Beck Hopelessness Scale Based on a National Representative Survey in Hungary
Social Relationships and Health
Depression, working models of others, and relationship functioning
A randomized trial of online single-session interventions for adolescent depression during Covid-19
Are You Still Bringing Me Down
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |