Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

After the ‘need for ... a father’

‘The welfare of the child’ and ‘supportive parenting’ in assisted conception clinics in the UK

Datos Bibliográficos

ID17819331
AutoresEllie Lee (0000-0001-8131-6872, University of Kent), Sally Sheldon (0000-0001-5472-9655, University of Kent, autor de correspondencia), Jan Macvarish (University of Kent)
Año2015
Volumen6
Número1
Páginas71-87
Fecha de publicación2015-05-02
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaFamilies Relationships and Societies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2046-7435 • E-ISSN: 2046-7443
EditorialPolicy Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1332/204674315x14303090462204
OpenAlexW2281284809
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas11

The law governing assisted conception in the United Kingdom (UK) (the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) mandates through section 13(5) that clinicians make ‘child welfare’ assessments before proceeding with treatment. In the 1990 Act, section 13(5) stated that assessment should take into account ‘the need ... for a father’, but in section 13(5) of a revised Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act in 2008 the words ‘a father’ were replaced with ‘supportive parenting’ in order to signal official recognition of same-sex parents. This article challenges the idea that this might be seen as an unequivocally progressive development through reference to a growing body of scholarship that critically evaluates the attention that policy makers have come to pay to ‘parenting’. It discusses the sociopolitical context that gave rise to section 13(5) and the pressures that led to its reform. Findings from an interview study with members of staff who work in assisted conception clinics in the UK are then discussed, focusing on staff’s perceptions of the new policy, the meanings they ascribe to the term ‘supportive parenting’ and their opinions about the responsibility they are given under law for child welfare. The article concludes that professionals’ understandings of their role resonate strongly with the wider realities of the oversight of parent–child relations considered characteristic of policies on parenting

Best interests · Political science · Public relations · Scholarship · Sociology · Welfare · Child Welfare and Adoption · Engineering · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Law · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • Parenting and social solidarity in cross-cultural perspective

    Charlotte Faircloth•Families Relationships and…•2020

  • Child welfare assessments and the regulation of access to publicly funded fertility treatment

    Open Access•J Lind•Reproductive Biomedicine &…•2020

  • ‘What kind of mum are you at the moment?’ Supernanny and the psychologising of classed embodiment

    Open Access•Tracey Jensen•Subjectivity•2010

  • Accessing Medicalized Donor Sperm in the US and Britain

    Open Access•Sandra Barney•Sexualities•2005

  • Cinderella and her cruel sisters

    Open Access•Julie McCandless•New Genetics and Society•2013

  • Blinded by neuroscience

    David Wastell, Susan W White•Families Relationships and…•2012

  • No Father Required”? The Welfare Assessment in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008

    Open Access•Julie McCandless, Sally Sheldon•Feminist Legal Studies•2010

  • Finally fit for purpose? The Human Fertilization and Embryology Act 2008

    Rachel Fenton, Susan Heenan et al.•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2010

  • Becoming a young mother

    Open Access•Naomi Rudoe•Critical Social Policy•2014

  • Conception and the Irrelevance of the Welfare Principle

    Open Access•Emily Jackson•Modern Law Review•2002

  • Supportive Parenting’, Responsibility and Regulation

    Open Access•Sally Sheldon, Ellie Lee et al.•Modern Law Review•2015

  • Developing Child-Centered Social Policies

    Open Access•Nicole Hennum•Social Sciences•2014

  • From Function to Competence

    Open Access•Val Gillies•Sociological Research Online•2011

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,33
Intervalo de citas2020 - 2020 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae