Two arguments for a transformational approach to second position elements

The literature on second position elements (a.k.a. second position clitics) is characterized by a longstanding discussion as to whether these elements are base-generated in second position or whether they are base-generated in first position and only arrive in second position as the result of a subsequent transformation. In this paper, I will provide two arguments for the transformational approach based on a typological study of second position coordinators ( Weisser 2024 ), i.e. coordinators that appear inside of one of their conjuncts rather than in the semantically transparent peripheral position (e.g. in between the two conjuncts). The first argument will be based on the observation that, although the coordinators usually occupy a second position within their coordinands, they also show positional alternations in some syntactic contexts. These alternations, I argue, can be derived in both transformational and base-generation models. However, we find that the kinds of empirically attested alternations are systematically restricted in a way that falls out of a transformational approach but that cannot be captured in a base-generation approach. In other words, the base-generation approach massively overgenerates predicting much more alternations than we actually find. The second argument is based on opaque interactions between the second position placement and other morphosyntactic operations

Position paper · Proposition · Transformational leadership · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

• The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis

  Lobke Aelbrecht•The syntactic licensing of ellipsis•2010

  Añadir item

• A-Morphous Morphology

  Open Access•Stephen R Anderson•A-Morphous Morphology•1992

  Añadir item

• A Grammar of Lezgian

  Martin Haspelmath•Grammar of Lezgian•1993

  Añadir item

• Aspects of the Theory of Clitics

  Stephen R Anderson, Stephen Anderson•Aspects of the Theory of Clitics…•2005

  Añadir item

• The Syntax of Silence

  Jason Merchant•The syntax of silence•2001

  Añadir item

• On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface

  Zeljko Boskovic•On the Nature of the Syntax-phonolo…•2001

  Añadir item

• The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category

  Martin Haspelmath•Converbs in Cross-Linguistic…•1995

  Añadir item

• A derivational ellipsis approach to ATB-movement

  Martin Salzmann•The Linguistic Review•2012

  Añadir item

• Warlpiri and the theory of second position clitics

  Open Access•Julie Anne Legate•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2008

  Añadir item

• Movement Operations after Syntax

  David Embick, Rolf Noyer•Linguistic Inquiry•2001

  Añadir item

• The Syntax and Prosody of Weak Pronouns in Chamorro

  Sandra Chung•Linguistic Inquiry•2003

  Añadir item

• Infixes really are (underlyingly) prefixes/suffixes

  Open Access•Laura Kalin•Language•2022

  Añadir item

• The Independence of Syntax and Phonology in Cliticization

  Judith L Klavans•Language•1985

  Añadir item