Establishing a Guide for Developing Organizational Support in Healthcare Following a Critical or Sentinel Event
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 18995166 |
|---|---|
| Autores | D Mark Austin (0000-0002-8238-6829, Auckland University of Technology, Wellington, New Zealand, autor de correspondencia), Gerard Pauley (Auckland University of Technology, Wellington, New Zealand), Lesley Ferkins (0000-0001-7890-3152, Auckland University of Technology, Wellington, New Zealand) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 32 |
| Número | 11 |
| Páginas | 1607-1619 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Qualitative Health Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1049-7323 • E-ISSN: 1552-7557 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/10497323221111644 |
| PMID | 35786094 |
| OpenAlex | W4283822369 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 62 |
Health professionals require support and recognition to help manage the well-known impact of critical or sentinel events relating to patient care. The potential distress can be magnified or mitigated by the response of the organization and colleagues. However, strategies that are accessible, relevant, and effective in the aftermath of a poor outcome are not well established. Using an action research methodology, a support tool was collaboratively designed, developed, and evaluated in a maternity service of one organization and adapted to the mental health and addiction service in another. Four principles that are intrinsic to the establishment of support tools became apparent across the two settings. Through applying these criteria to the customization of the support tool, it became relevant within the new service setting, and an implementation guide for other organizations was created. Although undertaken pre-pandemic, insights derived from this study may benefit post-pandemic situations where the need for health professional support is even greater
Action research · Business · Distress · Health care · Medical education · Mental health · Pandemic · Political science · Psychiatry · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Disaster Response and Management · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Safety and Medication Errors · Psychology
How we think.
Studying complexity in health services research
Health and Illness in a Connected World
‘Collective making’ as knowledge mobilisation
Medical error
Memoing in qualitative research
Prioritizing the Mental Health and Well-Being of Healthcare Workers
Resilience in Times of Global Pandemic
Reflections on the Researcher-in-Residence model co-producing knowledge for action in an Integrated Care Organisation
Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action
Using thematic analysis in psychology
The social construction of reality
Health and healthcare as the context for participatory action research
Co-create with stakeholders
Systemic action research
The Role of Action Research in the Investigation and Diffusion of Innovations in Health Care
Qualitative Research and Its Importance in Adapting Interventions
Paramedics' Experiences and Coping Strategies When Encountering Critical Incidents
Generalizability in Qualitative Research
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,33 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |