Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Factor structure and validity of the dyadic coping inventory–Bahasa Indonesia

Datos Bibliográficos

ID19002178
AutoresPingkan C B Rumondor (0000-0002-0778-929X, Universitas Indonesia Indonesia, autor de correspondencia), Ashley K Randall (0000-0003-3794-4163, Counseling and Counseling Psychology Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA), Urip Purwono (0000-0002-6629-8300, Universitas Padjajaran Indonesia), Darmawan Muttaqin (0000-0003-0272-5657, Faculty of Psychology Universitas Surabaya Surabaya Indonesia), Adriana Soekandar Ginanjar (0000-0001-6806-8456, Universitas Indonesia Indonesia)
Año2022
Volumen29
Número4
Páginas751-777
Fecha de publicación2022-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPersonal Relationships (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1350-4126 • E-ISSN: 1475-6811
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/pere.12459
OpenAlexW4313417830
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas60

In a country with collective cultural values like Indonesia, marriage is considered desirable. Despite the perceived importance of marriage, the divorce rate increases due to couple's experiencing stress from both outside and inside the relationship. This creates the urgency of a valid dyadic coping (DC) measurement for research and intervention. Current study aims to evaluate factor structure and validity of the Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI)–Bahasa Indonesia in measuring the DC of married individuals living in Indonesia, and to evaluate measurement invariance between genders. Confirmatory factor analyses on 303 Indonesians supported the 5‐factor structure regarding self and partner, and 2‐factor structure common DC. Measurement invariance analyses found weak factorial gender invariance for self and perceived partner subscales, whilst strict gender invariance was found for common DC subscales of the DCI–Bahasa Indonesia test scores. Correlations between the DC–Bahasa Indonesia marital satisfaction and external stress demonstrated evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. Moreover, using 118 dyads subset data and multitrait‐multimethod approach, this study found good construct validity for several DC factors. Limitations and future directions are presented

Confirmatory factor analysis · Construct validity · Convergent validity · Developmental psychology · Discriminant validity · Measurement invariance · Psychometrics · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Clinical Psychology · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Mathematics · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Cultural humility in international relationship research

    Open Access•Cimmiaron F Alvarez•Personal Relationships•2024

  • Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research.

    David A Cole•Journal of Consulting and…•1987

  • Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis

    Dennis L Jackson, J Arthur Gillaspy et al.•Psychological Methods•2009

  • Daily occupational stressors and marital behavior.

    Lisa B Story, Rena L Repetti et al.•Journal of Family Psychology•2006

  • Fathers' participation in family research

    Catherine L Costigan, Martha J Cox•Journal of Family Psychology•2001

  • Romantic partners' individual coping strategies and dyadic coping

    Lauren M Papp, Nicole L Witt•Journal of Family Psychology•2010

  • Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction

    Open Access•Mariana Falconier, Mariana K Falconier et al.•Clinical Psychology Review•2015

  • Stress and its associations with relationship satisfaction

    Open Access•Ashley K Randall, G Bodenmann•Current Opinion in Psychology•2017

  • Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance

    Gordon W Cheung, Roger B Rensvold•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2002

  • Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance

    Fangfang Chen, Fang Fang Chen•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2007

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results

    Open Access•James B Schreiber, Amaury Nora et al.•The Journal of Educational Research•2006

  • Testing the ruler with item response theory

    Janette L Funk, Ronald D Rogge•Journal of Family Psychology•2007

  • A checklist for testing measurement invariance

    Rens Van De Schoot, Peter Lugtig et al.•European Journal of Developmental…•2012

  • Encyclopedia of Women and Islamic Cultures

    Open Access•Nisreen Salti•Al-Raida Journal•1970

  • An Investigation of Item Bias

    Open Access•T Anne Cleary, Thomas L Hilton•Educational and Psychological…•1968

  • Couples coping with stress

    Tracey A Revenson, Karen Kayser et al.•Couples Coping With Stress•2005

  • Women as Secondary Earners

    Ariane Utomo•Asian Population Studies•2012

  • Who marries whom

    Ariane Utomo, P Mcdonald•Asian Population Studies•2016

  • Pubertal Timing and Tempo

    Open Access•Sonya Negriff, A Nayena Blankson et al.•Journal of Research on Adolescence•2014

  • Transition into marriage in Greater Jakarta

    Open Access•Ariane Utomo, Ariane J Utomo et al.•South East Asia Research•2016

  • Dyadic Coping in an Eastern European Context

    Petruta P Rusu, Peter Hilpert et al.•Measurement and Evaluation in…•2016

  • Validation of the English Version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory

    Christine Levesque, Marie-France Lafontaine et al.•Measurement and Evaluation in…•2014

  • Either I do or I must

    Open Access•Karel Karsten Himawan•The Social Science Journal•2018

  • Researching Gender-Role Ideologies Internationally and Cross-Culturally

    Open Access•J L Gibbons, Beverly A Hamby et al.•Psychology of Women Quarterly•1997

  • Gender in the Midst of Reforms

    Ariane Utomo, Ariane J Utomo•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Partners’ Dyadic Coping in India

    B Kanth, Ashley K Randall et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2022

  • Gender Balance, Representativeness, and Statistical Power in Sexuality Research Using Undergraduate Student Samples

    Open Access•Emily R Dickinson, MONIKA ELBERT et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2012

  • Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures

    Peter M Bentler, Douglas G Bonett•Psychological Bulletin•1980

  • What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research

    Fangfang Chen, Fang Fang Chen•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008

  • Dimensionalizing Cultures

    Open Access•Geert Hofstede•Online Readings in Psychology and…•2011

  • Psychometric Properties and Validity of Dyadic Coping Inventory-Urdu Version for Use in Pakistan

    Open Access•Sultan Shujja, Adnan Adil et al.•Interpersona An International…•2020

  • Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix

    Donald T Campbell, Donald W Fiske•Psychological Bulletin•1959

  • Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix

    James H Steiger•Psychological Bulletin•1980

  • Love in the melting pot

    Ariane Utomo, Ariane J Utomo•New Community•2020

  • Coping with global uncertainty

    Open Access•Ashley K Randall, Gabriel Leon et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2022

  • Marrying Up? Trends in Age and Education Gaps Among Married Couples in Indonesia

    Open Access•Ariane Utomo, Ariane J Utomo•Journal of Family Issues•2014

  • Whose stress? Emotion work in middle-class Javanese homes

    Carla Jones•Ethnos•2004

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,5
Intervalo de citas2024 - 2024 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae