Objectification in Common Sense Thinking
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19003623 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ivana Markova (0000-0003-0094-5912), Ivana S Marková (0000-0002-2095-7323, University of Stirling, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2012 |
| Volumen | 19 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 207-221 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2012-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Mind Culture and Activity (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1074-9039 • E-ISSN: 1532-7884 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10749039.2012.688178 |
| OpenAlex | W2066886749 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 24 |
In epistemologies of both scientific and common sense thinking “objectification” characterizes the formation of knowledge and concepts, yet in each case its meaning is different. In the former, objectification in acquiring knowledge refers to the individual's rationalistic reification of an object or of another person and to disengagement or alienation. Formation of concepts refers to the attainment of common features of persons, objects, or events. In the latter case, objectification is a dialogical process that takes place in daily activities and in communication. It rarely, if ever, pursues dispassionate ways but is judgmental and ethical. In this process, old myths, collective images, and historical narratives as well as habits of the mind, consciously and unconsciously present, refer to previous forms of knowledge and generate new ones. In this article, objectification in common sense thinking is discussed using an example of haemophilia in relation to HIV/AIDS. Haemophilia is a genetically transmitted disorder of blood clotting that has already been known as a family disease in Talmudic rulings in the second century. It seems that social representations of this disorder, which in its most common form affects male individuals because they inherit the defective gene from their mothers, evoke beliefs prevalent in various religions and mythologies. These beliefs and the lack of scientific knowledge about haemophilia have led, throughout history, to a wide spectrum of psychological and behavioural challenges with respect to patients, carriers, their relatives, and the general public. The nature of these challenges is not stable: They undergo alterations with technological advances in diagnosis and treatment as well as with changes in the understanding of medical complications including HIV/AIDS
Common sense · Dialogical self · Epistemology · Narrative · Objectification · Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Philosophy · Psychology · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology · Social Psychology
O desafio da individualidade na Teoria da Atividade Histórico-Cultural
A critical search for the learning object across school and out-of-school contexts
Reflections on the Use of DWR in Intercultural Collaboration
Green colonialism in the Nordic context
The construction of social reality as a process of representational naturalization. The case of the social representation of drugs
Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics
Everyday Discourse and Common Sense
Collective symbolic coping with new technology
The Philosophical Works of Descartes.
The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms
The Philosophy Of Symbolic Forms
The Problem of the Text in Linguistics, Philology, and the Human Sciences
Aspects of the Eighteenth Century
Hegel
The Quest for Certainty
On the Life of the Object
Self- and other-awareness of the risk of HIV/Aids in people with haemophilia and implications for behavioural change
Speech Genres and Other Late Essays
The Power of Visual Material
Dialogicality and Social Representations
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,42 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2014 - 2022 (9) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |