Embracing new paths in visual research facilitation

Opportunities, tensions & ethical considerations

Datos Bibliográficos

ID19003774
AutoresCasey Burkholder (0000-0003-3979-7021, Twitter (United States), autor de correspondencia), Funké Aladejebi (0000-0003-4432-5977), Josh Schwab-Cartas
Año2022
Volumen37
Número1-2
Páginas7-10
Fecha de publicación2022-03-15
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaVisual Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1472-586X • E-ISSN: 1472-5878
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1472586x.2021.1962735
OpenAlexW4220920649
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas31

This introduction to the special section establishes facilitation as an important yet underreported component of visual sociological research. Although institutional and regulatory ethics have been ingrained in university research settings, scholars such as Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang (2014) have asked us to consider the ways in which participants’ and communities’ refuse research influence our ethical frameworks. We take up Tuck and Yang’s call to ask: What does ethical research facilitation look like beyond institutional guidelines in visual research? What might deep, ethical, meaningful or useful facilitation look like in visual studies? Putting social justice concerns about power within research processes at the fore, the editorial argues that thinking through research facilitation must go beyond researcher reflexivity, and move towards action within the research settings in which we work

Action research · Economic Justice · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Facilitation · Pedagogy · Political science · Reflexivity · Research ethics · Social science · Sociology · Visual arts · Visual research · Art Therapy and Mental Health · Law · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics