Entangled Notions of Freedom and Dependence
An anthropological approach to the Japanese amae
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19008425 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ruprecht Mattig (0000-0003-2770-6321, autor de correspondencia), Marvin Giehl (0000-0002-9892-031X), Hiromi Masek (0000-0003-2893-940X), Miriam Mathias, Gamze Sener, Axel Wegner, Klaus-Christian Zehbe (0000-0002-7237-2239) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 32 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 137-152 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Paragrana (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0938-0116 • E-ISSN: 2196-6885 |
| Editorial | R. Oldenbourg Verlag (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/para-2023-0011 |
| OpenAlex | W4384073369 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 8 |
While freedom has traditionally been discussed in philosophy and political theory, this paper proposes an anthropological approach to the study of freedom. The focus is on the Japanese word amae , which Takeo Doi calls the ‘key’ to Japanese culture and contrasts with the ‘Western’ concept of freedom. After discussing Doi’s influential work, meanings are reconstructed from interviews and group discussions with Japanese people about amae . The interviewees define amae literally in terms of social ‘non-independence’ and, unlike Doi, understand it in a complex intertwining with freedom on the one hand and autonomy on the other. Overall, the paper argues that amae can hardly serve as a ‘key’ to understanding the Japanese, but can stimulate fruitful anthropological reflections not only on Japanese culture, but also on the concept of freedom
Autonomy · Epistemology · Individualism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Chinese history and philosophy · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Social and Cultural Dynamics
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |