Between fairness and efficiency
Testing Wilson’s theory of public administration
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19080152 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sophie Agulhon (0000-0002-2493-5076), Thomas Michael Mueller (0000-0002-8537-3302, Université Paris Cité) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-04-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | PREPRINT |
| Editorial | Center for Open Science (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.31219/osf.io/nzjsv |
| OpenAlex | W4223998130 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 9 |
During his first presidential term, faced with antitrust law reform, Woodrow Wilson had to deal with the reconstitution of conflicting values. On the one hand, the importance of efficiency, guaranteed by the role of experts capable of effectively managing public administration, on the other hand, the importance of public and democratic participation, and therefore respect for traditional democratic values. Wilson will face a theoretical impasse in defining concepts such as competition and fairness when developing antitrust laws and will have to put his theory of administration to the test. He will opt for a pragmatic approach, based on managerial ideas and integrating the figure of the manager, expert in know-how
Democracy · Economics · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Sociology · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration
The principles of scientific management
Organizational Psychology Then and Now
Expertise, Discretion, and Definite Law
When Economics Faces the Economy
The Politics–Administration Dichotomy in U.S. Historical Context
Progressivism and the New Democracy
Woodrow Wilson’s Administrative Thought and German Political Theory
Weber, Wilson, and Hegel
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |