Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Targetability as Credibility

The Judiciary and Refugee Status Determination in South Korea

Datos Bibliográficos

ID19218366
AutoresAngela Y Mcclean (0000-0002-5964-093X, Yale University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2026
Fecha de publicación2026-06-09
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Migration Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0197-9183 • E-ISSN: 1747-7379
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/01979183261454126
OpenAlexW7164055316
ISBN9791832614541
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas50

Credibility assessment is a central yet contested element of refugee status determination (RSD) across jurisdictions, with adjudicators often weighing extralegal signals of trustworthiness to determine who qualifies for protection. This paper advances the study of credibility and refugee recognition by empirically operationalizing a key but underexamined evaluative logic in judicial reasoning—“targetability,” or the perceived likelihood that an applicant would attract the attention of persecutors if returned. The analysis draws on a uniquely comprehensive dataset of 134 asylum litigation cases adjudicated in South Korea's first-level courts between 2005 and 2018. South Korea offers a critical case for examining the judicial construction of credibility: despite its advanced democratic institutions, it maintains one of the most restrictive asylum systems globally, with an exceptionally low refugee recognition rate. I find that courts predominantly deem applicants credible when they demonstrate sustained active engagement in politically or socially sensitive causes, a degree of public visibility, and verifiable evidence of past persecution. Over time, these traits have redefined the institutional standard for credibility itself, privileging publicly legible forms of vulnerability and narrowing the scope of what refugeehood can entail. By specifying how “targetability” is operationalized in practice, the study contributes to broader comparative debates on the extralegal construction of credibility and the judiciary's role in shaping access to refugee protection

Credibility · Democracy · Operationalization · Refugee · Scope (computer science) · Vulnerability (computing) · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies · Migration, Refugees, and Integration

  • Case Selection for Case‐Study Analysis

    John Gerring•The Oxford handbook of political…•2009

  • Discrimination and Delegation

    Lamis Abdelaaty, Lamis Elmy Abdelaaty•Discrimination and Delegation•2021

  • Let Me Be a Refugee

    Rebecca Hamlin•Let Me Be a Refugee•2014

  • Rejecting Refugees

    C Bohmer, Amy Shuman•Rejecting Refugees•2007

  • Political Asylum Deceptions

    Open Access•C Bohmer, Amy Shuman•Political Asylum Deceptions•2018

  • Inside Asylum Bureaucracy

    Open Access•Julia Dahlvik•Inside Asylum Bureaucracy•2018

  • Time’ in Refugee Status Determination in Australia and the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Michelle Foster, Hannah Gordon et al.•International Journal of Refugee…•2022

  • Do the Facts Speak for Themselves? Country of Origin Information in French and British Refugee Status Determination Procedures

    R Gibbs, R Gibb et al.•International Journal of Refugee…•2013

  • What Assumptions about Human Behaviour Underlie Asylum Judgments

    Jane Herlihy, Kate Gleeson et al.•International Journal of Refugee…•2010

  • From the Law to the Decision

    Open Access•Jonathan Miaz•European Policy Analysis•2017

  • Citizenship and the Performance of Credibility

    Sara L Mckinnon•Text and Performance Quarterly•2009

  • A Rare Examination of Typically Unobservable Factors in US Asylum Decisions

    Linda Camp Keith, Jennifer S Holmes•Journal of Refugee Studies•2009

  • Cultures of Ignorance, Disbelief and Denial

    V Robinson, Veronica Nmoma Robinson•Journal of Refugee Studies•1999

  • Performance Anxieties

    Open Access•Trish Luker•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2014

  • Building a Better Refugee Status Determination System

    Open Access•Martin K Jones, Martin Jones et al.•Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge•2008

  • The Emerging Migration State

    Open Access•James F Hollifield•International Migration Review•2004

  • The Path to Asylum in the US and the Determinants for who Gets in and Why

    Open Access•Andy J Rottman, Christopher J Fari et al.•International Migration Review•2009

  • Credibility, Proof and Refugee Law

    James Sweeney, J A Sweeney•International Journal of Refugee…•2009

  • Why courts are the life buoys of migrant rights

    Open Access•Natascha Zaun, Martin Leroch et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2024

  • Web Scraping for Migration, Mobility, and Migrant Integration Studies

    Open Access•Jasper Tjaden•International Migration Review•2025

  • Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Immigration

    Open Access•C Joppke•World Politics•1998

  • Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research

    Open Access•Jason Seawright, John Gerring•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • Discriminating Decentralization

    Open Access•Thomas Holzer, T E Holzer et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2000

  • Asylum and State Sovereignty

    Open Access•C Joppke•Comparative Political Studies•1997

  • The Legal-domestic Sources of Immigrant Rights

    Open Access•C Joppke•Comparative Political Studies•2001

  • The New Grand Compromise

    Rawan Arar•Middle East Law and Governance•2017

  • The Permission to be Cruel

    Open Access•Monish Bhatia•Critical Criminology•2020

  • The Complexity of Determining Refugeehood

    C Rousseau•Journal of Refugee Studies•2002

  • Norms and Interests in US Asylum Enforcement

    Open Access•Marc R Rosenblum, Idean Salehyan•Journal of Peace Research•2004

  • Trained to Disbelieve

    Laura Affolter•Geopolitics•2022

  • Should (S)he Stay or Should (S)he Go? - Street-level Suspicion and the Construction of the '(Un)deserving Migrant

    L M Borrelli•Geopolitics•2022

  • The Janus-faced court of naturalisation

    Nora Hui‐jung Kim, Nora Hui-Jung Kim•New Community•2016

  • New and enduring narratives of vulnerability

    Kate Smith, Louise Waite•New Community•2019

  • The developmental migration state

    Erin Aeran Chung, Darcie Draudt et al.•New Community•2024

  • Strategies of denial

    Open Access•Emmaleena Käkelä•New Community•2022

  • Fatal flaws in the UK asylum decision-making system

    Liza Schuster•New Community•2020

  • Here, Man Is Nothing

    Open Access•M Griffiths•Men and Masculinities•2015

  • Constructing truths in a culture of disbelief

    Open Access•Olga Jubany•International Sociology•2011

  • The Sociology of Refugee Migration

    David Scott Fitzgerald, Rawan Arar•Annual Review of Sociology•2018

  • Preserving Law and Order

    Open Access•Angela Y Mcclean•International Political Sociology•2024

  • Seeking Asylum in Germany

    Open Access•Y Kosyakova, Herbert Brücker•European Sociological Review•2020

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae