Capturing the DSM‐5 Alternative Personality Disorder Model Traits in the Five‐Factor Model's Nomological Net
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19278874 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Takakuni Suzuki (0000-0003-4247-280X, Purdue University, autor de correspondencia), Sarah A Griffin (0000-0002-7364-8401, Purdue University), Douglas B Samuel (0000-0003-3592-1523, Purdue University) |
| Año | 2017 |
| Volumen | 85 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 220-231 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2017-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Personality (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-3506 • E-ISSN: 1467-6494 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jopy.12235 |
| PMID | 26691245 |
| OpenAlex | W2209708271 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 11 |
| Referencias citadas | 69 |
Several studies have shown structural and statistical similarities between the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM‐5 ) alternative personality disorder model and the Five‐Factor Model (FFM). However, no study to date has evaluated the nomological network similarities between the two models. The relations of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI‐R) and the Personality Inventory for DSM‐5 (PID‐5) with relevant criterion variables were examined in a sample of 336 undergraduate students ( M age = 19.4; 59.8% female). The resulting profiles for each instrument were statistically compared for similarity. Four of the five domains of the two models have highly similar nomological networks, with the exception being FFM Openness to Experience and PID‐5 Psychoticism. Further probing of that pair suggested that the NEO PI‐R domain scores obscured meaningful similarity between PID‐5 Psychoticism and specific aspects and lower‐order facets of Openness. The results support the notion that the DSM‐5 alternative personality disorder model trait domains represent variants of the FFM domains. Similarities of Openness and Psychoticism domains were supported when the lower‐order aspects and facets of Openness domain were considered. The findings support the view that the DSM‐5 trait model represents an instantiation of the FFM
Big Five personality traits · Factor (programming language) · Nomological network · Personality · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Personality Traits and Psychology · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Social Psychology
The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF)
Identity Development and Maladaptive Personality Traits in Young Refugees and First- and Second-Generation Migrants
Measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 across sex
General and maladaptive traits as predictors of specific conspiracy beliefs related to Covid-19 and Russian-Ukrainian war
Self‐esteem mediates effects of normal and pathological personality traits on subjective well‐being
Psychometric Properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 -Brief Form in a Community Sample with High Rates of Trauma Exposure
Developing an Italian Adaptation of the Interpersonal Sensitivities Circumplex (ISC-IT) Using Ant Colony Optimization
Creative, Antagonistic, and Angry? Exploring the Roots of Malevolent Creativity with a Real‐World Idea Generation Task
The healthy personality from a basic trait perspective
Maladaptive beliefs as mediators of the relationship between personality traits and Borderline Personality Disorder symptoms
Big Five aspects of personality interact to predict depression
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR)
Personality Trait Change in Adulthood
Internal Consistency, Retest Reliability, and Their Implications for Personality Scale Validity
Personality and the Prediction of Consequential Outcomes
Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders
Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5
The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature
Personality Plasticity After Age 30
A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders
The Satisfaction With Life Scale
Integrating Normal and Abnormal Personality Structure
Ten‐Year Rank‐Order Stability of P ersonality Traits and Disorders in a Clinical Sample
Structures of Personality and Their Relevance to Psychopathology
Comparing Clinical and Social‐Personality Conceptualizations of Narcissism
Capturing Abnormal Personality With Normal Personality Inventories
The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age
The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures
From madness to genius
Stability versus change, dependability versus error
At what sample size do correlations stabilize
A Hierarchical Analysis of 1,710 English Personality-Descriptive Adjectives
Is the genetic structure of human personality universal? A cross-cultural twin study from North America, Europe, and Asia
Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior
Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder
Between facets and domains
Delineating the Structure of Normal and Abnormal Personality
Quantifying construct validity
A meta-analysis of normal and disordered personality across the life span
Personality profiles of cultures
Construct validity in psychological tests
A power primer
Linking "big" personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders
| Obras citantes distintas | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 10 |