Individual commitment to risky and conservative choices as a determinant of shifts in group decisions 1
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19280167 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Eugene Burnstein (University of Michigan), Stuart Katz (University of Michigan) |
| Año | 1971 |
| Volumen | 39 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 564-580 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1971-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Personality (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-3506 • E-ISSN: 1467-6494 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1971.tb00063.x |
| OpenAlex | W2056454024 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 21 |
S ummary The consistently positive relationship between initial riskiness and perceived influence obtained in past work led us to speculate that (1) the deliberative effort involved in making a choice increases with its riskiness, as a result (2) individuals who select a risky course of action will be more committed to their choice than conservative individuals, and (3) the former will be more influential in group decisions. The following support was obtained for these conjectures When individuals had to select a reaction time interval to beat, those who were risky, that is, who selected a short interval, were more confident in having chosen wisely, were less likely to feel they might change their choice given the opportunity, and took longer to make their choice than those who were conservative, that is, who selected a long interval The first two of these measures were assumed to reflect commitment to the choice, and the third was taken as a rough indication of the amount of effort involved in choosing A group decision was also made regarding the reaction time interval It tended to be riskier than that preferred by the average individual prior to the decision if the riskiest member was more committed and/or expended more effort in choosing than his partners, on the other hand, it tended to be more conservative than the average prior preference if the most conservative member was more committed and or expended more effort
Action (physics) · Economics · Interval (graph theory) · Microeconomics · Preference · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Mathematics · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management · Social Psychology
Effects of familiarization and group discussion upon risk taking
An Analysis of Group Decisions Involving Risk ("The Risky Shift")
"Discussion, Decision, Commitment, and Consensus in "Group Decision
The requirements and design of a standard group task
Familiarization, group discussion, and risk taking
The roles of information, discussion, and consensus in group risk taking
Components of group risk taking
Leadership and group decisions involving risk
Publicity of initial decisions and the risky shift phenomenon
Can group members recognize the effects of group discussion upon risk taking
A reexamination of the familiarization hypothesis in group risk taking
Are risk takers more persuasive than conservatives in group discussion
Diffusion of responsibility and level of risk taking in groups
Convergent validation of risk taking measures
Group influence on individual risk taking
On what type of task will a group do well
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,07 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1971 - 1977 (7) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |