Personality and psychopathology
In defense of a practical path toward integrating psychometric and biological approaches to advance a comprehensive model
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19282017 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jay Fournier (0000-0001-8967-1668, Department of Psychiatry University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA, autor de correspondencia), Nicole Roberts (0000-0002-8448-5986, University of Pittsburgh), Nicole J Roberts (Department of Psychiatry University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA), Katy Lauren Ford (Department of Psychiatry University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 90 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 61-74 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Personality (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-3506 • E-ISSN: 1467-6494 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jopy.12605 |
| PMID | 33135156 |
| OpenAlex | W3097559484 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 113 |
Personality and psychopathology each reflect patterns of internal experience and outward behavior that differ between people and affect functioning. Drawing strict distinctions between the two concepts is not only difficult, but it may prove unnecessary for advancing an integrated model of psychological experiences associated with mental illness. We argue that developing such a model will be critical for improving treatment outcomes, and we discuss a practical path forward. Proponents of psychometric approaches to developing models of psychological experience focus on observable phenotypes and utilize statistical methods to describe patterns of covariation among a broad range of symptoms and dispositions. Advocates of biologically based approaches emphasize neuroscientific tools for identifying abnormalities in brain function that give rise to an individual's experience. There is substantial evidence that measures of personality and measures of symptoms capture nonoverlapping, clinically important information for understanding how and for whom treatments for mental illness work. In this article, we highlight the importance of combining psychometric and neurobiological approaches in order to understand which features of an individual those measures reflect, which aspects of neurobiology generate and maintain those features, how they relate to each other, and critically, how best to alter them to reduce distress and dysfunction
Big Five personality traits · Cognitive psychology · Distress · Mental health · Mental illness · Personality · Psychopathology · Psychotherapist · Clinical Psychology · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Mental Health Research Topics · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Psychology · Social Psychology
Social Epidemiology
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Saliency, switching, attention and control
Three Concerns With Applying a Bifactor Model as a Structure of Psychopathology
Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control
Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)
The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders Compared With Diagnosis-Specific Protocols for Anxiety Disorders
Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology
Explicit and implicit emotion regulation
Tripartite model of anxiety and depression
Acute and Longer-Term Outcomes in Depressed Outpatients Requiring One or Several Treatment Steps
Searching for a baseline
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP)
A cognitive-affective system theory of personality
Nosological Reflections
The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models
A Clinical‐Empirical Model of Personality
A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention
The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior
DSM-III and the revolution in the classification of mental illness
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,75 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |