Modified Brown–Forsythe Procedure for Testing Interaction Effects in Split-Plot Designs
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19290735 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Guillermo Vallejo (0000-0002-8010-6854), Manuel Ato |
| Año | 2006 |
| Volumen | 41 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 549-578 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2006-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Multivariate Behavioral Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0027-3171 • E-ISSN: 1532-7906 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1207/s15327906mbr4104_6 |
| PMID | 26794918 |
| OpenAlex | W2011093957 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 47 |
The standard univariate and multivariate methods are conventionally used to analyze continuous data from groups by trials repeated measures designs, in spite of being extremely sensitive to departures from the multisample sphericity assumption when group sizes are unequal. However, in the last 10 years several authors have offered alternative solutions to these tests that do not rest on this assumption. In an attempt to improve the precision of the Brown-Forsythe (BF) procedure, a new approximate degrees of freedom (df) approach is presented in this article. Unlike the BF test, the new method not only assures that the df will be always positive but also provides invariant solutions under linear transformations of the data. Monte Carlo methods are used to compare the new solution, in terms of control of Type I error rates, with the modified empirical generalized least squares and BF methods. Our extensive numerical studies show that the modified BF procedure outperformed the other two methods for a wide range of conditions
Algorithm · Design of experiments · Invariant (physics) · Monte Carlo method · Multivariate statistics · Range (aeronautics) · Sphericity · Statistics · Type I and type II errors · Univariate · Applied Mathematics · Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock · Genetics and Plant Breeding · Mathematics · Optimal Experimental Design Methods
A Practical Method for Analyzing Factorial Designs with Heteroscedastic Data
Exploring Changes in Activity Patterns in Individuals with Chronic Pain
Comparative Robustness of Recent Methods for Analyzing Multivariate Repeated Measures Designs
Comparison of Modern Methods for Analyzing Repeated Measures Data With Missing Values
Robustness?
Synthesis of Variance
A Method for Simulating Non-Normal Distributions
Small Sample Inference for Fixed Effects from Restricted Maximum Likelihood
Simulating Multivariate Nonnormal Distributions
Hierarchical linear models
A Comparison of the Bootstrap-F, Improved General Approximation, and Brown-Forsythe Multivariate Approaches in a Mixed Repeated Measures Design
Bootstrap Resampling Approaches for Repeated Measure Designs
Testing Repeated Measures Hypotheses When Covariance Matrices are Heterogeneous
The Analysis of Repeated Measurements with Mixed-Model Adjusted F Tests
Effects of Covariance Heterogeneity on Three Procedures for Analyzing Multivariate Repeated Measures Designs
Comparison of Two Procedures for Analyzing Small Sets of Repeated Measures Data
Analyzing Multivariate Repeated Measures Designs
Testing Repeated Measures Hypotheses when Covariance Matrices are Heterogeneous
Repeated Measures Interaction Test with Aligned Ranks
A Comparison of Data Analysis Strategies for Testing Omnibus Effects in Higher-Order Repeated Measures Designs
Some Alternative Approximate Tests for a Split Plot Design
Small sample profile analysis with many variables
Multiple Imputation for Missing Data
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,21 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2007 - 2020 (14) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |