Rate my attitude
Research agendas and RateMyProfessor scores
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19377908 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michael Carlozzi (0000-0003-0773-3867, Independent Researcher, USA, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2018 |
| Volumen | 43 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 359-368 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2018-04-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0260-2938 • E-ISSN: 1469-297X |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02602938.2017.1348465 |
| OpenAlex | W2726753914 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 44 |
The literature on student evaluations of teaching (SETs) generally presents two opposing camps: those who believe in the validity and usefulness of SETs, and those who do not. Some researchers have suggested that ‘SET deniers’ resist SETs because of their own poor SET results. To test this hypothesis, I analysed essays by 230 SET researchers (170 lead authors) and classified the researchers as having negative, neutral or positive attitudes towards SETs. I retrieved their RateMyProfessors.com (RMP) scores and, using logistic regression, found that lead authors with negative attitudes towards SETs were 14 times more likely to score below an estimated RMP average than lead authors with positive attitudes towards SETs. Co-authors and researchers with neutral attitudes, on the other hand, did not significantly differ from the RMP average. These results suggest that personal attitudes towards SETs may drive research findings
Logistic regression · Statistics · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Computer Science · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback
On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching
College students' views of male and female college teachers
Student Evaluations of Teaching: Are They Related to What Students Learn?
Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks
Students' evaluations of University teaching
Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse
Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics
The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles
What does ratemyprofessors.com actually rate
Ratings of university teacher instruction
Correlations, trends and potential biases among publicly accessible web-based student evaluations of teaching
Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction
A Selective Review of the Validity of Student Ratings of Teaching
A Selective Review of the Validity of Student Ratings of Teachings
Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective
Sex', 'Race' and Multiculturalism
Is There Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching
Student Ratings in a Consumerist Academy
| Citas por año | 0,5 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2023 (2) |
| Altamente citado | No |