The ‘Right’ to Die

The capacity to sustain human biological life by biomedical technology and improved life support systems has reawakened debate on the ‘right’ to die and euthanasia. How can the medical and allied health professions resolve the dilemma between a basic respect for human life and the changed conditions of biomedical technology? Drawing upon the philosophic, religious, and medical traditions of the West, this paper explores and weighs the arguments for and against voluntary passive euthanasia. It is concluded that infants and children, minors, senile, psychotic, mentally retarded, and irrecoverably brain damaged persons should not be considered candidates for euthanasia because they are not competent to judge. Involuntary and active euthanasia are condemned as outside the religious and medical traditions of the West. This leaves a small group of candidates for euthanasia who are mentally competent and fully informed of their chances for prolongation of life. Consideration should also be given to the family of the dying person

Developmental psychology · Dilemma · Epistemology · Family medicine · Human life · Human rights · Management · Medical treatment · Mental health · Mental illness · Mentally ill · Mentally retarded · Political science · Psychiatry · Right to die · Right to life · Sociology · Turnover · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Law · Medicine · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Philosophy · Psychology

• De l’approche biomédicale à l’art du soin

  Jocelyne Saint-Arnaud, Jocelyne Saint‐arnaud•Frontières•2020

  Añadir item

• Active and Passive Euthanasia

  James Rachels•New England Journal of Medicine•1975

  Añadir item

• Why Food and Fluids Can Never Be Denied

  Open Access•Patrick G Derr•The Hastings Center Report•1986

  Añadir item

• The Practice of Death

  Robert Fulton, Robert S Fulton et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1976

  Añadir item